Question · asked by 1 review
Structured risk assessment vs usual care: Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants)
- Population
- aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
- Intervention
- Structured risk assessment
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants)
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Structured risk assessment vs standard professional care Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) compared with standard professional care (low certainty). Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.83 [0.39, 8.7] | 1 study · 20 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.