Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control: Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (combined time points)
- Population
- recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (combined time points)
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (combined time points) · first‐episode or recent‐onset psychosis Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with control (low certainty). Cognitive behavioural therapy added to standard care for first‐episode and recent‐onset psychosis (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.82 [0.57, 1.18] | 7 studies · 693 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapy added to standard care for first‐episode and recent‐onset psychosis 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.