Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control: Risk for at least one adverse event per patient

Population
recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
Intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care
Comparison
control
Outcome
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… changes adverse events ‐ participants with at least one adverse event ‐ < 12… compared with control (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care vs control
Adverse events ‐ participants with at least one adverse event ‐ < 12 months · first‐episode or recent‐onset psychosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… changes adverse events ‐ participants with at least one adverse event ‐ < 12… compared with control (very low certainty).
Cognitive behavioural therapy added to standard care for first‐episode and recent‐onset psychosis (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.85, 1.97]1 study · 43 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Cognitive behavioural therapy added to standard care for first‐episode and recent‐onset psychosis
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.