Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

677 questions · 719 findings · 133 reviews

No studies found 153 · 21.3%GRADE not reported 54 · 7.5%Very low 164 · 22.8%Low 199 · 27.7%Moderate 119 · 16.6%High 30 · 4.2%

MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy

ACR 50 response of DMARDs naive patients Number of responders · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

MTX combination showed no clear difference in ACR 50 response of DMARDs naive patients Number of responders compared with MTX monotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy

ACR 50 response of MTX inadequate responders number of responders · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

MTX combination probably leads to higher ACR 50 response of MTX inadequate responders number of responders compared with MTX monotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy

ACR 50 response of non‐MTX DMARDs inadequate responders number of responders · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

MTX combination showed no clear difference in ACR 50 response of non‐MTX DMARDs inadequate responders number of… compared with MTX monotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy

Withdrawals due to adverse events · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

It is very uncertain whether MTX combination changes withdrawal due to adverse reactions (Pooled across regimens) number… compared with MTX monotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death or stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher death or stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Long‐term ipsilateral stroke · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment probably leads to higher ipsilateral stroke compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Type of recurrent event · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in type of recurrent event compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Death · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment may leads to higher death compared with conventional medical treatment alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment vs conventional medical treatment alone

Dependency · people with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Endovascular therapy plus conventional medical treatment showed no clear difference in dependency compared with conventional medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review