Question · asked by 1 review

Labour induction vs expectant management: Caesarean section

Population
women with term or near term (> 37 weeks' gestation) with suspected fetal macrosomia
Intervention
Labour induction
Comparison
expectant management
Outcome
Caesarean section

Induction of labour showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with expectant management (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Induction of labour vs expectant management
Caesarean section · women with term or near term (> 37 weeks' gestation) with suspected fetal macrosomia
Induction of labour showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with expectant management (moderate certainty).
Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.91 [0.76, 1.09]4 studies · 1190 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.