Question · asked by 1 review

MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy: Withdrawals due to adverse events

It is very uncertain whether MTX combination changes withdrawal due to adverse reactions (Pooled across regimens) number… compared with MTX monotherapy (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
MTX combination vs MTX monotherapy
Withdrawal due to adverse reactions (Pooled across regimens) number of withdrawals · patients with Rheumatoid arthritis
It is very uncertain whether MTX combination changes withdrawal due to adverse reactions (Pooled across regimens) number… compared with MTX monotherapy (very low certainty).
Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combination therapy with non‐biologic disease modifying… (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.59 [1.2, 2.12]17 studies · 1624 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate combination therapy with non‐biologic disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid…
2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.