Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,410 questions · 8,901 findings · 1,091 reviews

No studies found 1,687 · 19%GRADE not reported 1,469 · 16.5%Very low 1,969 · 22.1%Low 2,060 · 23.1%Moderate 1,302 · 14.6%High 414 · 4.7%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

Proportion of participants without tumour response (CR+PR) · primary hepatocellular carcinoma

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT may leads to lower proportion of participants without tumour response (CR+PR) compared with TACE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

Non‐serious adverse events: leukopenia · primary hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes non‐serious adverse events: leukopenia compared with TACE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

Non‐serious adverse events: serum transaminases elevation · primary hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes non‐serious adverse events: serum transaminases elevation compared with TACE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

Non‐serious adverse events: total bilirubin elevation · primary hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes non‐serious adverse events: total bilirubin elevation compared with TACE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation

Proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation · primary hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation compared with TACE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Early developmental intervention programmes vs standard follow‐up

Motor outcome at school age (Griffiths Locomotor, MABC) · preterm infants
2 findings from 1 review

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Proportion of participants requiring further IOP‐lowering interventions (additional surgery, medications, or both) (lower number of events is better) · Participants with acute primary angle closure after initial medical treatment to lower intraocular pressure

It is very uncertain whether phacoemulsification changes proportion of participants requiring further IOP‐lowering… compared with laser peripheral iridotomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Proportion of participants with 1 or more recurrent APAC episodes in the same eye (lower number of events is better) · Participants with acute primary angle closure after initial medical treatment to lower intraocular pressure

It is very uncertain whether phacoemulsification changes proportion of participants with 1 or more recurrent APAC episodes in… compared with laser peripheral iridotomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

TUG (lower score = faster) · adults following hip fracture surgery

The intervention showed no clear difference in TUG (lower score = faster) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

TUG (lower score = faster) · adults following hip fracture surgery

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes TUG (lower score = faster) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review