TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs chemoembolisation: Proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation
It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation compared with TACE (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
TACE followed by 3‐DCRT vs TACE Proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation · primary hepatocellular carcinoma It is very uncertain whether TACE followed by 3‐DCRT changes proportion of participants without serum AFP normalisation compared with TACE (very low certainty). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation followed by three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 96 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation followed by three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transcatheter arterial… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.