Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

747 questions · 815 findings · 144 reviews

No studies found 154 · 18.9%GRADE not reported 147 · 18%Very low 164 · 20.1%Low 199 · 24.4%Moderate 121 · 14.8%High 30 · 3.7%

Intervention not reported

Pain Acroparaesthesia and Fabry crises · Anderson‐Fabry disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cocaine use assessed by the mean (SD) proportion of cocaine‐free urinalysis across the study per participant · people with cocaine dependence
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Intracranial pressure (ICP) within the treatment period · people with acute TBI secondary to head injury
1 finding from 1 review

Initiation of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) vs Low/non-fluoridated water (0.4 ppm fluoride or less)

Disparities in caries across socioeconomic status (SES) · People of all ages in a community setting; the included caries studies were all in children aged 3 to 16 years
1 finding from 1 review
  • There is insufficient information to determine whether initiation of a water fluoridation programme results in a change in disparities in caries levels across SES. Data from 3 observational studies (participants not…
    3 studies · 35399 participants
    Low

Intervention not reported

Progressive intracranial haemorrhage · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury

The intervention leads to lower progressive intracranial haemorrhage (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Liberal vs restrictive transfusion protocols

Inability to walk 10 feet (3 m; or across a room) without human assistance · Patients with hip fracture repair

Liberal showed no clear difference in inability to walk 10 feet (3 m; or across a room) without human… compared with restrictive threshold transfusion (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cessation of water fluoridation (fluoride removed from the water supply) vs Continued fluoridated water

Disparities in caries across socioeconomic status (SES) · People of all ages in a previously fluoridated community (Maupome 2001: children with generally low caries experience)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

ACR 50 American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The intervention probably leads to higher ACR 50 American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thyrotropin‐releasing hormone tartrate vs placebo

Short‐term (1 week) change in isolated movement, objective and subjective measures of speech production SARA. Scale from: 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate more severe speech disorder. · people with speech disorder resulting from hereditary ataxias
1 finding from 1 review

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Gingivitis · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing may leads to lower gingivitis (bleeding and gingival indices; standardised across… compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review · compare the 2 reviews

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing

Plaque · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)

Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing showed no clear difference in plaque (plaque indices; standardised across indices) compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review · compare the 2 reviews

Intervention not reported

ACR50 American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria · participants with rheumatoid arthritis and with a partial response to DMARDs

The intervention probably leads to higher ACR50 American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Outcome: ACR50 ‐ American College of Rheumatology Improvement Criteria · participants with rheumatoid arthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

ACR50 American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria · participants with rheumatoid arthritis and with partial response to MTX

The intervention probably leads to higher ACR50 American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐fatal macrovascular outcomes 1. Composite a. Intervention vs metformin [1a. 6 months to 4 years] b. Intervention vs thiazolidinediones [1b. 52 weeks to 4 years] c. Intervention vs meglitinide [1c. 12 months to 15 months]2. Non‐fatal myocardial... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intervention may leads to lower non‐fatal macrovascular outcomes 1. Composite a. Intervention vs… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review