Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

199 questions · 351 findings · 38 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 338 · 96.3%Very low 4 · 1.1%Low 8 · 2.3%Moderate 1 · 0.3%High 0 · 0%

38% SDF + potassium iodide solution (applied annually) vs Tricalcium silicate (TCS) paste (applied twice daily)

Remineralization/arrest of early enamel carious lesions · Patients with early enamel carious lesions on permanent molars

For early enamel lesions, annual SDF+KI was significantly LESS effective than twice-daily tricalcium silicate paste (54.8% vs 100% arrested; p<0.001; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

38% SDF + potassium iodide solution (applied annually) vs CPP-ACP

Remineralization/arrest of early enamel carious lesions · Patients with early enamel carious lesions on permanent molars

For early enamel lesions, annual SDF+KI was significantly less effective than twice-daily CPP-ACP (54.8% vs 100% arrested; p<0.001; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride varnish vs Untreated lesions (single-arm before vs after proportion)

Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL)

Professionally applied 5% sodium fluoride varnish remineralised about two-thirds of early enamel caries lesions in children (pooled proportion 63.6%, 95% CI 36.0% to 91.2%; 4 studies); certainty was not GRADE-rated and heterogeneity was very high (I2=96%).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride varnish vs No fluoride treatment

Dimensional change (size) of early enamel caries lesions · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL)

In one trial, professionally applied sodium fluoride varnish significantly reduced the size of early enamel caries lesions compared with no fluoride treatment; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Not specified

Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early (incipient) enamel caries

One trial found acidulated phosphate fluoride gel did not remineralise early enamel caries; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Not specified

Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early (incipient) enamel caries

One trial found sodium fluoride gel significantly remineralised early enamel caries; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

10% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Glass ionomer restoration and tooth-brushing

Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early enamel caries in erupting permanent first molars

One pilot study found 10% silver diamine fluoride worked about as well as glass ionomer restoration and tooth-brushing for remineralising early enamel caries; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

6% sodium fluoride with 6% calcium fluoride varnish vs no treatment

Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early enamel caries (permanent dentition)

One trial found 6% sodium fluoride plus 6% calcium fluoride varnish significantly reversed early enamel caries versus no treatment; ungraded and not meta-analysed.

1 finding from 1 review

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side (same patient)

Development and eruption of the second permanent molar · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Root closure and eruption of the second permanent molar appeared accelerated on the extraction side in a single case-control study; ungraded and not statistically tested.

1 finding from 1 review

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Teeth in the same arch/patient with the first permanent molar present

Caries and/or fillings in adjacent teeth · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

One study found fewer decayed or filled proximal surfaces but more decayed or filled occlusal surfaces in arches with an extracted first permanent molar; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side

Spontaneous space closure · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar is followed by variable spontaneous closure of the post-extraction space (about 45.5% to 85.2% of cases); certainty was not GRADE-rated (Shekelle category III).

1 finding from 1 review

Early childhood caries (ECC) vs Caries-free primary dentition

Caries development in permanent teeth · School children and adolescents (6-18 years) followed from primary dentition (baseline examination before 72 months of age)

Early childhood caries increases the likelihood of caries in permanent teeth roughly three-fold, but the certainty of evidence is very low (OR 3.22, 95% CI 2.80 to 3.71).

1 finding from 1 review

Early extraction of a compromised mandibular first permanent molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side (same patient)

Development and eruption of the third molar · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Development and eruption of the third molar appeared accelerated after early first permanent molar extraction in two studies (e.g., eruption OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.96); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review