Question · asked by 1 review

1.23% APF gel vs Not specified: Remineralisation of early enamel caries

One trial found acidulated phosphate fluoride gel did not remineralise early enamel caries; ungraded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel vs Not specified
Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with incipient (early) enamel caries · Children in clinical dental settings
One trial found acidulated phosphate fluoride gel did not remineralise early enamel caries; ungraded.
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016) All outcomes
One double-blind randomised trial found acidulated phosphate fluoride gel was not effective to remineralise early enamel caries.1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review.
2016 All outcomes
Publications from 1948 to 2014 (search date not reported)17Critically Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.