Same question across reviews · CL0131

intervention :: Fluoride gel/foam -> Other outcome

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
5
Questions
6
current versions
GRADE rated
2
Review overlap (CCA)
NR
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
12,500 ppm F (NaF/olaflur/dectaflur) amine fluoride gel vs 0 ppm F placebo gel
Number of participants with more severe DLs (severity of DLs) · Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond) · At debond (end of orthodontic treatment)
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment (2019) · Cochrane
Additional SoF Table 1. Number of participants with more severe DLs: none of the trials reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies
12,500 ppm F (NaF/olaflur/dectaflur) amine fluoride gel, professionally applied every 3 months plus home use vs 0 ppm F placebo gel
Number of participants with new demineralised lesions (DLs) · Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond) · At debond; mean follow-up 16.6 months
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.76, 1.27]1 study · 312 participantsVery low
Fluoride gel (450 ppm) vs High-content fluoride toothpaste (1350 ppm)
Incidence of ORN · Adults with head and neck cancer undergoing curative or adjuvant radiotherapy (at risk of osteoradionecrosis of the… · 14 to 36 months
Interventions for preventing osteoradionecrosis of the jaws in adults receiving head and neck radiotherapy (2019) · Cochrane
This comparison was only made in 1 study, which showed no difference between the 2 interventions: no patients in either group developed ORN (12- to 36-month follow-up) (0/99 in the fluoride gel group and 0/91 in the…1 study · 220 participantsVery low
1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel vs Not specified
Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with incipient (early) enamel caries
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
One double-blind randomised trial found acidulated phosphate fluoride gel was not effective to remineralise early enamel caries.1 studyUngraded
Glass ionomer sealant (with fluoride gel plus dentifrice) vs Fluoride gel plus fluoride toothpaste/dentifrice (non-invasive control)
Caries (lesion) progression (radiographic) · Dentate children and adults with non-cavitated proximal caries lesions extending into enamel or dentine (not pulp) in… · 12 to 36 months (radiographic follow-up), Glass ionomer sealant
Micro‐invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.52]1 studyUngraded
Fluoride gel (topically applied; operator- or self-applied; any fluoride agent/concentration; frequency at least once a year) vs Placebo or no treatment
Mucosal irritation / oral soft-tissue allergic reaction · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or younger
Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2015) · Cochrane
None of the studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies

Filter these questions further