Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

85 questions · 86 findings · 11 reviews

No studies found 9 · 10.5%GRADE not reported 16 · 18.6%Very low 19 · 22.1%Low 32 · 37.2%Moderate 10 · 11.6%High 0 · 0%

Primary objective: mobile stock notification with effective product transport vs usual care

Provider acceptability and satisfaction (Proportion of participants who reported using the digital intervention) · healthcare workers and other health professionals involved in commodity and stock management
1 finding from 1 review

Primary objective: mobile stock notification with enhanced management vs usual care

Provider acceptability and satisfaction (Proportion of participants who reported using the digital intervention) · healthcare workers and other health professionals involved in commodity and stock management
1 finding from 1 review

Gamified oral health interventions (mobile apps, serious games, augmented reality, game-based education) vs Non-digital gamified oral health interventions (card/board games, storytelling, printed aids)

Long-term behavior change and overall oral health outcomes · Children or adolescents

Digital gamified interventions appear more effective than non-digital alternatives for long-term behavior change and oral health outcomes, but the evidence is narrative and ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review
  • The Application of Gamification in Children's Oral Health Management: Systematic Review. 2025 All outcomes
    Long-term follow-up (sustained behavior change) · Schools, dental clinics, and mobile-app user-testing environments
    Digital-based interventions were more effective in fostering long-term behavior change compared with nondigital alternatives and consistently outperformed nondigital alternatives in improving oral health outcomes;…
    Studies not reported
    GRADE not reported

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

Number experiencing adverse effects · the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes adverse events: number of people experiencing an AE compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events: number of people experiencing a serious adverse event compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

Exacerbations (number of people experiencing ≥ 1 exacerbations) · the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes exacerbations: number of people experiencing at least one exacerbation compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital register vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3) · children under 5 years of age

Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3) compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive intervention (re‐exploration) (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review