Question · asked by 1 review
Digital register vs usual care: Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age
- Population
- children under 5 years of age
- Intervention
- Digital register
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age
Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Digital register vs routine care Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age Digital register showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty). Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.03 [0.88, 1.2] | 1 study · 205 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.