Cochrane · systematic review · CD013246
Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Janjua, S, Banchoff, E, Threapleton, CJD, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
11
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 63.6%Low 4 · 36.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management compared to control for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Random‐effects model)
Population: the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Impact on health behaviour: 6MWD Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 122 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Self‐efficacy: PRAISE Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 55 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Self‐efficacy: SEMCD total Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 42 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Quality of life: CRQ total, SGRQ total or CAT Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 123 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Dyspnoea symptoms: CRQ dyspnoea Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 84 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Exacerbations: mean number of exacerbations Digital intervention with or without routine supported self‐management vs control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 69 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Multi‐component intervention compared to other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Random‐effects model)
Population: the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Impact on health behaviour: 6MWD Multi‐component intervention vs other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 20 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Quality of life: SGRQ total Multi‐component intervention vs other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 241 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Exacerbations: number of people experiencing at least one exacerbation Multi‐component intervention vs other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment | OR 0.86 [0.58, 1.28] | 2 studies · 485 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Adverse events: number of people experiencing an AE Multi‐component intervention vs other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment | OR 1.07 [0.51, 2.25] | 1 study · 166 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Adverse events: number of people experiencing a serious adverse event Multi‐component intervention vs other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment | OR 0.85 [0.55, 1.34] | 1 study · 319 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |