Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

35 questions · 35 findings · 22 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 8 · 22.9%GRADE not reported 1 · 2.9%Very low 10 · 28.6%Low 9 · 25.7%Moderate 6 · 17.1%High 1 · 2.9%

SMP vs usual care

Quality of life measured on multiple scales (0 to 100; higher score = better quality of life) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · patients with osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measured on multiple scales (0 to 100; higher score = better quality of life) Postintervention: first assessment after end of treatment; no later than 3 months · children and adolescents aged 4 years to 18 years, with chronic musculoskeletal pain
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Global quality of life score Multiple measures used. WHO‐Five‐Wellbeing Index (Ledderer 2013) FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional study (reported in comments section): SF20 subscales (Blanchard 1996). Higher scores indicate better QoL · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Global quality of life FLIC total score (Blanchard 1996), FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional studies (reported in comments section): FACT‐B physical functioning subscale (Baucom 2009). EPIC multiple subscales and overall scores (Campb... · individuals with cancer (patients)
1 finding from 1 review