Cochrane · systematic review · CD006716

Interventions for the treatment of metastatic extradural spinal cord compression in adults

George, R, Sundararaj, JJ, Govindaraj, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
35
current version
GRADE rated
23
No studies
8
Included studies
NR
No studies 8 · 22.9%Ungraded 4 · 11.4%Very low 4 · 11.4%Low 8 · 22.9%Moderate 11 · 31.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) compared to short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy in two fractions) for adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression

Population: adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression (poor prognosis with visceral metastasis, and no spinal instability or bony impingement of cord)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ambulation One month after radiation
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
RR 0.93 [0.82, 1.04]1 study · 303 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Survival
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Reduction in analgesic and narcotic use One month after radiation
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
RR 0.85 [0.62, 1.16]1 study · 271 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Urinary continence One month after radiation
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
RR 1.03 [0.96, 1.1]1 study · 303 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Local recurrence MRI:
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
RR 2.21 [0.69, 7.01]1 study · 303 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events Grade 3 oesophagitis, diarrhoea and nausea
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.69]1 study · 303 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Single‐fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) compared to short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy) for adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression

Population: adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression (poor prognosis, no spinal instability or bony impingement of cord)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ambulation One month after treatment
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
RR 1.02 [0.9, 1.15]1 study · 276 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Survival
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Reduction in analgesic and narcotic use One month after radiation
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
RR 1.27 [0.96, 1.67]1 study · 262 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Urinary continence One month after radiation
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
RR 0.97 [0.93, 1.02]1 study · 275 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Local recurrence
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
RR 0.1 [0.01, 1.72]1 study · 276 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events Grade 3 oesophagitis, diarrhoea, and nausea
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
RR 1.77 [0.43, 7.25]1 study · 276 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (2 fractions, 16 Gy)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Laminectomy plus radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy for adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression

Population: adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression (single lesion, no prior radiotherapy, fit for surgery)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ambulation At four months
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 0.98 [0.38, 2.48]1 study · 29 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Survival At four months
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 1.22 [0.59, 2.53]1 study · 29 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Reduction in analgesic use
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 0.88 [0.42, 1.81]1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Urinary continence One month after treatment
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 1.06 [0.57, 2]1 study · 29 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Local recurrence
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extracted1 study · 29 participantsUngraded
Quality of life
Laminectomy plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy for adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression

Population: adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression (fit for surgery, paraplegic less than 48 hours, and without multiple discrete compressions or radiosensitive tumours; with cervical or thoracic lesions, and life expectancy three months or more)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ambulation Immediately after completing RT
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 1.48 [1.16, 1.9]1 study · 101 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Survival (short term) At 30 days
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
RR 1.09 [0.96, 1.24]1 study · 101 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Reduction in analgesic and narcotic use
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extracted1 study · 101 participantsUngraded
Urinary continence
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extracted1 study · 101 participantsUngraded
Local recurrence
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extracted1 study · 101 participantsUngraded
Quality of life
Decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy vs radiotherapy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

High‐dose corticosteroids compared to moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids for adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression

Population: adults with metastatic extradural spinal cord compression (without peptic ulceration or infection; mixed prognosis)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Ambulation
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
RR 1.08 [0.81, 1.45]3 studies · 105 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Survival (long term) Over two years
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
RR 1.11 [0.24, 5.05]1 study · 57 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Pain reduction
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
RR 0.86 [0.62, 1.2]1 study · 25 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Urinary continence One week after treatment
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
RR 1.18 [0.66, 2.13]1 study · 34 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Local recurrence ‐
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serious adverse events
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
RR 8.02 [1.03, 62.37]2 studies · 77 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life
High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids
no estimate extractedNRNo studies