evidence/gaps
Cochrane · systematic review · CD008757

Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis

Köpke, S, Solari, A, Rahn, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 20%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Information provision compared to (optimised) standard care for people with multiple sclerosis

Population: people with multiple sclerosis
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcomes (see also Table 3)
Information provision vs (optimised) standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Knowledge
Information provision vs (optimised) standard care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 505 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Decision making
Information provision vs (optimised) standard care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 793 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life
Information provision vs (optimised) standard care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 671 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events
Information provision vs (optimised) standard care
no estimate extracted7 studies · 751 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias