Cochrane · systematic review · CD008757

Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis

Köpke, S, Solari, A, Rahn, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.

Questions

current version

GRADE rated

No studies

Included studies

No studies 1 · 20%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Information provision compared to (optimised) standard care for people with multiple sclerosis

Population: people with multiple sclerosis

CD008757.PUB3 (current) · 5 questions

Outcome	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Outcomes (see also Table 3) Information provision vs (optimised) standard care	no estimate extracted	NR	No studies
Knowledge Information provision vs (optimised) standard care	no estimate extracted	5 studies · 505 participants	Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias
Decision making Information provision vs (optimised) standard care	no estimate extracted	5 studies · 793 participants	Low Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life Information provision vs (optimised) standard care	no estimate extracted	6 studies · 671 participants	Low Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events Information provision vs (optimised) standard care	no estimate extracted	7 studies · 751 participants	Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias

Comparison

Population: People with multiple sclerosis

CD008757.PUB2 · 4 questions

Outcome	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Knowledge Four different self‐reported questionnaires	no estimate extracted	4 studies · 524 participants	Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias
Decision making Different self‐reported measures and instruments	no estimate extracted	4 studies · 836 participants	Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Quality of life SF‐363 and HAQUAMS4	no estimate extracted	5 studies · 605 participants	Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse events Different adverse effects used	no estimate extracted	6 studies · 765 participants	Ungraded