Cochrane · systematic review · CD007672

Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow‐up of patients with cancer

Aubin, M, Giguère, A, Martin, M, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity compared to usual care

Population: cancer patients
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Functional status Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted16 studies · 3966 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Physical status Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted25 studies · 5070 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Psychological status Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted20 studies · 4634 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Social needs Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1278 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Satisfaction Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 378 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Global quality of life Multiple scales. Scale from: 0 to 100.
Interventions designed to improve any type of continuity vs usual care
no estimate extracted10 studies · 2622 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency