What do systematic reviews say?

Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs usual or enhanced care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs usual or enhanced care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 230 participants
  Very low

Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs usual or enhanced care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 686 participants
  Very low

Interventions to reduce blood loss during myomectomy for fibroids vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Family interventions vs no intervention

Family interventions probably leads to lower new smoking at compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

• Family‐based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.76 [0.68, 0.84]
  9 studies · 48102 participants
  Moderate

Topical interventions (sucralfate, interferon-alpha, cyclosporin A) vs placebo

• Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
  SoF (topical interventions vs placebo), grouped comment spanning all four listed outcomes (verbatim): "5 placebo-controlled trials evaluated topical interventions (sucralfate suspension (2 trials), interferon-alpha (2…
  Studies not reported
  GRADE not reported

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes adverse events: number of people experiencing an AE compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (very low certainty).

• Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.07 [0.51, 2.25]
  1 study · 166 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events: number of people experiencing a serious adverse event compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (low certainty).

• Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.85 [0.55, 1.34]
  1 study · 319 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

• Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

• Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 241 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs other treatments/routine care

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes exacerbations: number of people experiencing at least one exacerbation compared with other intervention or routine, usual care or control treatment (very low certainty).

• Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.86 [0.58, 1.28]
  2 studies · 485 participants
  Very low

Multicomponent interventions vs no intervention

• Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 2961 participants
  Moderate

Multicomponent interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multicomponent interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether implementation interventions changes quality of care: healthcare professional adherence to EBP at 12 months compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.19 [0.53, 2.64]
  2 studies · 1455 participants
  Very low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.5
  1 study · 100 participants
  Low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: HRQoL (EQ‐5D: –0.59 to 1, higher score… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.01
  2 studies · 1242 participants
  Moderate

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: ADL (Barthel Index, 0–20, higher score =… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.29
  2 studies · 1272 participants
  Moderate

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: psychological well‐being (GHQ‐12, 0–36,… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 1273 participants
  Low

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found