Cochrane · systematic review · CD009149

Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and middle‐income countries

van Ginneken, N, Chin, WY, Lim, YC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Effective Practice and Organisation of Care2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
119
current version
GRADE rated
89
No studies
30
Included studies
NR
No studies 30 · 25.2%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 50 · 42%Low 29 · 24.4%Moderate 10 · 8.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions compared to usual care in treating common mental disorders in adults in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adults with common mental disorders (CMDs)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from CMDs ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Recovery defined by HDRS < 8a; SRQ‐20 ≤ 7b (RR > 1 denotes greater likelihood of recovery)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
RR 1.29 [1.06, 1.56]2 studies · 308 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of CMDs ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Diagnosis defined by SRQ‐20 > 7b; PHQ‐9 ≥ 11d (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
RR 0.42 [0.18, 0.96]2 studies · 479 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Severity of CMD symptoms (including anxiety and depression) ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Measured by PHQ‐9a,d,f; SRQ‐20b (higher score, higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 798 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Measured by EQ‐5D (higher score = better quality of life)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 521 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Functional impairment/disability ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Measured by WHODAS 2.0 (higher score = higher disability)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1399 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
RR 0.43 [0.11, 1.66]1 study · 493 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events RR < 1 indicates lower risk of adverse eventsÂ
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1014 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care compared to usual care in treating common mental disorders (CMDs) in adults in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adults with common mental disorders
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from CMD ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Recovery defined by GDS ≤ 11a; HDRS < 7b; HDRS < 8c; PHQ‐9 < 6d; PHQ‐9 < 5 or 50% reduction from baselinee (RR > 1 denotes greater likelihood of recovery)
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
RR 2.26 [1.5, 3.43]5 studies · 804 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of CMD ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Diagnosis defined by presence of ICD‐10 diagnosis on CIS‐Rg; prevalence defined by [Total number ‐ number recovered (recovery defined by HDRS < 8)]c (RR < 1 denotes lower prev...
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
RR 0.57 [0.32, 1.01]2 studies · 2820 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
CMD symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Measured by change in CIS‐Rg; GHQ‐12i; HDRSc; PHQ‐9e,j,k scores from baseline (greater decline = greater improvement)
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 4419 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) EQ‐5Di; SF‐36c,m; WHOQOL‐BREFe,j,n (higher score = better quality of life)
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 2199 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Functional impairment ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) WHODAS 2.0e,g,i,j,k (higher score = higher disability)
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 4216 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ referral to mental health team ‐ long term (7 to 12 months post intervention)Â
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
RR 0.46 [0.33, 0.64]1 study · 907 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ deathÂ
Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care
RR 0.63 [0.38, 1.06]5 studies · 5300 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions compared to enhanced usual care for treating perinatal depression in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: women with perinatal depression
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from depression ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Recovery defined by Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ≤ 5a; PHQ‐9 < 5b,c; absence of major depression based on DSM‐IV criteriad (RR > 1 denotes greater likelihood of...
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.29 [1.08, 1.54]4 studies · 1243 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Prevalence of perinatal depression (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Severity of depression symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scalea; Hamilton Depression Rating Scaled,f; PHQ‐9b,c (higher score = higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1989 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Quality of life (1 to 6 months post intervention)Â
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Global assessment of functioning scale, WHODAS (higher score = higher functional impairment)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1856 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Service utilisation ‐ maternal or child hospitalisations ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.12 [0.6, 2.06]2 studies · 850 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adverse events (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1205 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions compared to usual or enhanced care in treating perinatal depression in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: women with perinatal depression
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Depression recovery ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Disease prevalence (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score (higher score = higher severity)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extracted1 study · 230 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) SF‐36 social functioning (higher score = higher quality of life)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
MD 3.51 study · 230 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Functional impairment ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Service utilisation ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Mean number of medical consultations
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extracted1 study · 230 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events (7 to 24 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led collaborative care interventions vs usual or enhanced care
no estimate extracted1 study · 686 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness

Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions compared to usual care in treating adults with post‐traumatic stress or common mental disorders in humanitarian settings in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adults with post‐traumatic stress and CMDs
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from PTSD (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevalence of PTSD ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months) Diagnosis defined by fulfilment of PTSD diagnostic criteria using the PCL‐5a; fulfilment of DSM‐IV PTSD diagnostic criteria using the CIDIb (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
RR 0.77 [0.3, 2]2 studies · 380 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
PTS symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) PCL‐5a,d,e; PCL‐6f; Post‐traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scaleb (higher score = higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 2045 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Depression symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) GHQ‐12a; PHQ‐9d,e,f; self‐reporting questionnaireh (higher score = higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1986 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) PSYCHLOPS (higher score = poorer outcome)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1918 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Functional impairment ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) WHODAS (higher score = more severity impairment)
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1914 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ hospital admissions (1 to 6 months post intervention) Â
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
RR 1.13 [0.53, 2.34]1 study · 319 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events
Lay health worker‐led psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1701 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions compared to usual or no care for treating adults with post‐traumatic stress or common mental disorders in humanitarian settings in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adults with post‐traumatic stress or common mental disorders
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from PTSD
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevalence of adults with probable PTSD (1 to 6 months post intervention) Diagnosis defined by HTQ ≥ 1.75 (RR > 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
RR 5.5 [2.5, 12.1]1 study · 313 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of adults with probable depression or anxiety (1 to 6 months post intervention) Diagnosis defined by HSCL‐25 ≥ 1.75 (RR > 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
RR 4.6 [2.1, 10.08]1 study · 313 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
PTS symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (higher score = higher severity)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 680 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Depression symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Hopkins Symptom Checklist ‐ depression (higher score = higher severity)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 680 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention) Locally developed functional impairment scale (higher score = higher functional impairment)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 680 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1572 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events (RR > 1 denotes greater risk of harm)
Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual or no care
RR 2.22 [0.23, 21.34]4 studies · 1242 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use compared to enhanced usual care in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.28 [0.94, 1.74]4 studies · 872 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.01 [0.91, 1.13]1 study · 882 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ risk of hazardous or harmful alcohol use
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 667 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol and substance use (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 540 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 498 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ unplanned hospitalisations (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower risk)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.9 [0.29, 2.72]1 study · 336 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ deaths (RR < 1 denotes lower risk)
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.34 [0.1, 1.18]3 studies · 1025 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions compared to enhanced usual care for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.93 [0.77, 1.12]3 studies · 1075 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Prevalence of cannabis use (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.1 [0.67, 1.8]1 study · 152 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ risk of harmful or hazardous drinking (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1075 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ overall risk of harmful or hazardous alcohol and substance use (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 705 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
MD 01 study · 560 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Functional impairmentÂ
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Service utilisation (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ incidence of visits to primary care centres due to alcohol consumption (RR > 1 denotes greater risk)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 0 [0.01, 2.5]1 study · 107 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ incidence of alcohol‐related consequences ‐ accidents (RR > 1 denotes greater risk)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.23 [0.03, 1.97]1 study · 107 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness

Lay health worker‐led interventions compared to enhanced usual care for adult patients with alcohol dependence in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adult patients with alcohol dependence
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical recovery ‐ harmful or dependent alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) Defined by AUDIT score < 8 (RR > 1 denotes higher likelihood of recovery)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.87 [0.9, 3.9]1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Prevalence of alcohol dependence (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ depression (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 121 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ Unplanned hospitalisation in past 12 months (RR > 1 denotes higher risk of hospitalisation)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.7 [0.26, 1.88]1 study · 112 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ death in past 12 months (RR > 1 denotes higher risk of death)
Lay health worker‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 0.32 [0.01, 7.7]1 study · 135 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness

Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions compared to enhanced usual care for adult patients with substance dependence in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: adult patients with substance dependence
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical recovery
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevalence of morphine use
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
RR 1.06 [0.63, 1.8]1 study · 173 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol use (< 1 month post intervention)
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
MD 0.11 study · 155 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Clinical symptoms ‐ drug use (< 1 month post intervention) ‐ heroin
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life (< 1 month post intervention) ‐ social functioning
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
48.36 [41.8, 54.92]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Functional impairment
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Service utilisation
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Lay health worker‐ compared to specialist‐led care for people with severe mental disorder in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: people with severe mental disorder
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from severe mental disorders
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prevalence of severe mental disorders
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Schizophrenia symptoms severity ‐ immediately post intervention Assessed by BPRSa; PANSSb (Chatterjee 2014) (higher scores = greater symptom severity)
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 364 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Caregiver burden symptom severity ‐ immediately post intervention Assessed by Burden Assessment Schedule (higher scores = higher burden)
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted1 study · 253 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment ‐ immediately post intervention Assessed by IDEASb; SDSSa (lower scores = less functional impairment)
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 364 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ hospitalisation during intervention (RR > 1 denotes greater risk)Â
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
RR 8.64 [1.17, 63.92]1 study · 282 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ death from suicide during intervention (RR > 1 denotes greater risk)Â
Lay health worker‐ vs specialist‐led care
RR 0.51 [0.03, 8.03]1 study · 282 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care compared to specialist‐led care for people with severe mental disorder in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: people with severe mental disorder
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical recovery from severe mental disorder (immediately post intervention) Defined by BPRS decreased by ≥ 80% (RR > 1 denotes greater likelihood of recovery)
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
RR 1.08 [0.81, 1.44]1 study · 76 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Relapse of severe mental disorder (immediately post intervention) Defined by re‐appearance of symptoms or worsening of symptoms necessitating adjustment of medicationa; Li 2002; based on 1 item scoring ≥ 5 or 2 items scoring ≥ 4 in items 4, 7, 11,...
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
RR 0.3 [0.16, 0.55]4 studies · 492 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of severe mental disorder
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Schizophrenia symptoms severity (immediately post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 836 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Depression symptom severity (immediately post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 270 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life (immediately post intervention)
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 536 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Functional impairment ‐ immediately post intervention
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extracted7 studies · 874 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ hospital re‐admission (during intervention) (RR > 1 denotes greater risk)
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
RR 0.6 [0.28, 1.28]3 studies · 441 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse eventsÂ
Primary health professional‐led or collaborative care vs specialist‐led care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Primary health professionals and lay health workers compared with usual care in improving dementia patients' and carers' outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: people with dementia and their carers
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Clinical illness recovery
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Disease prevalence
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Severity of behavioural symptoms (patient) (1 to 6 months post intervention)Measured using the behavioural symptom scale (NPI‐S) (high score = greater severity)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 134 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Severity of mental distress (carer) (1 to 6 months post intervention) Neuropsychiatric Interview for dementia (higher score = better quality of life)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 134 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life (patient) (1 to 6 months post intervention) DEMQOL (higher score = better quality of life)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life (carer) (1 to 6 months post intervention) WHOQOL‐BREF (higher score = better quality of life)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 53 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Functional impairment (patient) (1 to 6 months post intervention) EASI (higher score = higher impairment in activities of daily living)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 81 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation ‐ home visits by LHW and psychiatrist (during intervention)
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 81 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Adverse events ‐ number of deaths (during intervention) Â
Primary health professionals and lay health workers vs usual care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 141 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care in treating children with post‐traumatic stress and common mental disorders in humanitarian settings in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: children/adolescents with post‐traumatic stress and related depressive/anxiety symptoms
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Depression or PTSD recovery
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Disease prevalence
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Depression symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Depression self‐rating scale (higher score = higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1092 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
PTS symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Child post‐traumatic stress scale (higher score = higher severity)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1090 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention) Locally developed functional scale (higher score = higher impairment)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1092 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events (during intervention)
Lay health worker‐led psychosocial interventions vs usual or no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 809 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Community professional‐led interventions vs no care in treating children with post‐traumatic stress and common mental disorders in humanitarian settings in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Population: children/adolescents with post‐traumatic stress and related depressive/anxiety symptoms
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recovery from probable PTSD in children (< 1 month post intervention) Defined by number of participants whose CRIES‐13 score was above cutoff for diagnosis of PTSD at baseline ‐ number of participants whose CRIES‐13 score was above cutoff for the ...
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
RR 3.93 [1.31, 11.8]1 study · 78 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Prevalence of PTSD
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
PTS symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Harvard Trauma Questionnairec; PTSD‐RId; UCLA PTSD indexe (higher score = higher severity)
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 679 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Depression symptoms (1 to 6 months post intervention) Beck Depression Inventorye; Oxford Measure of Psychosocial Adjustmentd (higher score = higher severity)
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 602 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention) Child diagnostic interview schedulee; WHODAS IId (higher score = higher functional impairment)
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 602 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Service utilisation
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events (during intervention)Â
Community professional‐led interventions vs no care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 180 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness