Question · asked by 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention: Patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor journeys per week at 6 months

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Implementation interventions vs no intervention
Patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor journeys per week at 6 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation
Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor… compared with no intervention (low certainty).
Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.51 study · 100 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.