Cochrane · systematic review · CD012575
Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation
Cahill, LS, Carey, LM, Lannin, NA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library
Effective Practice and Organisation of CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 16.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Implementation interventions compared with no intervention for promoting uptake of evidence‐based practices in stroke rehabilitation
Population: healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quality of care: healthcare professional adherence to EBP at 12 months Implementation interventions vs no intervention | RR 1.19 [0.53, 2.64] | 2 studies · 1455 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor journeys per week at 6 months Implementation interventions vs no intervention | MD 0.5 | 1 study · 100 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Patient health status: HRQoL (EQ‐5D: –0.59 to 1, higher score better) at up to 6 months Implementation interventions vs no intervention | MD 0.01 | 2 studies · 1242 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Patient health status: ADL (Barthel Index, 0–20, higher score = better) at up to 6 months Implementation interventions vs no intervention | MD 0.29 | 2 studies · 1272 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Patient health status: psychological well‐being (GHQ‐12, 0–36, higher score = worse) at up to 6 months Implementation interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 1273 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Health professional outcomes Implementation interventions vs no intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |