Motivational interviewing vs assessment and feedback
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Music therapy plus standard care showed no clear difference in retention in treatment compared with standard care alone (moderate certainty).
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in treatment retention compared with methadone (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression (IPT‐D) changes treatment retention compared with other Psychological Interventions (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether integrated CBT changes treatment retention compared with twelve Step Facilitation (very low certainty).
The intervention leads to lower retention in treatment (high certainty).
The intervention leads to higher retention in treatment (high certainty).
Motivational interviewing (MI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with treatment (low certainty).
Brief motivational interviewing (BMI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with assessment‐only to reduce alcohol consumption (moderate certainty).
Motivational interviewing intensive (MII) may leads to higher retention ‐ end of treatment compared with motivational interviewing (MI) to reduce alcohol consumption (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether cognitive‐behavioural coping skills training (CBCST) changes retention ‐ end of treatment compared with twelve‐step facilitation (TSF) programme to reduce alcohol consumption (very low certainty).
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm showed no clear difference in retention in treatment Objective compared with pharm standard (high certainty).
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in treatment retention Early dropout compared with buprenorphine (low certainty).
The intervention leads to higher retention in treatment ‐ New studies (high certainty).
The intervention showed no clear difference in retention at treatment completion (CM vs. control) (low certainty).