Motivational interviewing vs treatment: Retention [
Motivational interviewing (MI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with treatment (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Motivational interviewing (MI) vs treatment Retention ‐ end of treatment · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users Motivational interviewing (MI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with treatment (low certainty). Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.96 [0.87, 1.06] | 1 study · 256 participants | Low |
Motivational interviewing (MI) vs treatment Retention · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users Motivational interviewing (MI) showed no clear difference in retention compared with treatment (low certainty). Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.93 [0.6, 1.43] | 2 studies · 160 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.