Cochrane · systematic review · CD005336
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder
Gates, PJ, Sabioni, P, Copeland, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Drugs and AlcoholAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: adults with cannabis use disorder or frequent cannabis use
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cannabis use frequency at short‐term | MD 5.67 [3.08, 8.26] | 6 studies · 1144 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Point‐prevalence abstinence rates at short‐term | RR 2.55 [1.34, 4.83] | 6 studies · 1166 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Cannabis use quantity per day at short‐term | SMD 3.55 [2.51, 4.59] | 8 studies · 1600 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Symptoms of dependence at short‐term | SMD 4.15 [1.67, 6.63] | 4 studies · 889 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Cannabis‐related problems at short‐term | SMD 3.34 [1.26, 5.42] | 6 studies · 2202 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Retention in treatment | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 1424 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |