Cochrane · intervention · CD001724

Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2006 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthPeriodontology2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
4
Included studies
17
as reported
No studies 4 · 22.2%Ungraded 14 · 77.8%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and aggressive periodontitis excludedAge range of included studies 21 to 81 years; both sexes in all studies; one study with majority smokers (21 of 38)
InterventionGuided tissue regeneration (GTR) alone; GTR combined with bone substitutesGTR alone (n=16 studies); GTR + bone substitutes (n=2 studies)
ComparisonOpen flap debridement (access flap surgery)Open flap debridement (n=17)
OutcomesPrimary: tooth loss; change in attachment levels; patient well-being or quality of life. Secondary: change in probing depths; change in gingival recession; changes in bone/hard tissue (radiographic; hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry); disease recurrence; percentage of sites with <=4 mm probing depth at completion; aesthetics; post-operative complications; economic outcomesAttachment level change (n=16); sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (n=6); probing depth reduction (n=11); gingival recession (n=9); radiographic bone change (n=2); hard tissue probing at re-entry (n=3); tooth loss (n=17, none reported); adverse effects/membrane exposure (n=16); patient morbidity/pain (n=1); treatment time (n=1)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials of at least 12 months duration8 parallel-group and 8 split-mouth RCTs (two studies with both elements); 17 total
TimingAt least 12 months duration12 months minimum follow-up

Search date: 2004-04. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register; MEDLINE; EMBASE; Journal of Periodontology; Journal of Clinical Periodontology; Journal of Periodontal Research

Questions and results

Current version only

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Population: Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and aggressive periodontitis excluded
CD001724.PUB2 (current) · 14 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Cost/benefit (treatment time plus estimated material costs)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Aesthetics (patient's opinion)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.22 [0.80, 1.64]16 studiesUngraded
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.39 [1.08, 1.71]3 studiesUngraded
Tooth loss
No tooth loss was reported in any study although these data are incomplete where patient follow-up was not complete (no events; no estimable effect).17 studiesUngraded
Treatment / surgical procedure time
MD 23.91 studyUngraded
Radiographic bone change
>=12 months
Radiographic data was contained in two studies. Mayfield 1998 showed 0.6 mm gain in bone from the base of the defect in both test and control groups; Ratka-Kruger 2000 reported descriptively that only minute changes in…2 studiesUngraded
Change in gingival recession
>=12 months
MD 0.26 [0.08, 0.43]9 studiesUngraded
Sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (proportion)
>=12 months
RR 0.54 [0.31, 0.96]6 studiesUngraded
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction)
>=12 months
MD 1.21 [0.53, 1.88]11 studiesUngraded
Disease recurrence (% sites with >=2 mm loss of probing attachment from 12 months after treatment)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Ease of maintenance (% of sites with <4 mm probing depth)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Patient well-being / quality of life
Cortellini 2001: 36% of GTR patients reported the procedure interfered with daily activity for an average of 2.7 days versus 32% of controls for an average of 2.4 days; no significant difference for postoperative pain…1 studyUngraded
Post-operative complications / adverse effects (including pain, infection)
Adverse effects were generally minor. Healing was generally uneventful for both test and control groups. Exposure of the GTR barrier membrane was widely reported, ranging from 20% of sites (non-resorbable…16 studiesUngraded

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Population: Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and aggressive periodontitis excluded
CD001724.PUB2 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain)
>=12 months
MD 3.37 [3.14, 3.61]1 studyUngraded
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.25 [0.89, 1.61]2 studiesUngraded
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction)
>=12 months
MD 1.24 [0.89, 1.59]2 studiesUngraded
Change in gingival recession
>=12 months
MD -0.33 [-0.43, -0.23]1 studyUngraded

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Population: Patients with chronic adult periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and early-onset periodontitis excluded
CD001724 · 13 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Radiographic bone change
>=12 months
Radiographic data was contained in only one study (Mayfield 1998). This showed 0.6 mm gain in bone from the base of the defect in both test and control groups (no difference; no pooled estimate).1 studyUngraded
Cost/benefit (treatment time plus estimated material costs)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction)
>=12 months
MD 0.80 [0.14, 1.46]5 studiesUngraded
Change in gingival recession
>=12 months
MD -0.06 [-0.33, 0.20]3 studiesUngraded
Aesthetics (patient's opinion)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Post-operative complications / adverse effects (including pain, infection)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.39 [1.08, 1.71]3 studiesUngraded
Patient well-being / quality of life
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Ease of maintenance (% of sites with <4 mm probing depth)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (proportion)
>=12 months
RR 0.58 [0.38, 0.88]4 studies · 255 participantsUngraded
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.11 [0.63, 1.59]10 studiesUngraded
Disease recurrence (% sites with >=2 mm loss of probing attachment from 12 months after treatment)
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies
Tooth loss
No data were found for this outcome (listed under 'Other outcomes: No data were found for the following outcomes').0 studiesNo studies

Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with bone substitutes/graft vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Population: Patients with chronic adult periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and early-onset periodontitis excluded
CD001724 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Change in clinical attachment level (attachment gain)
>=12 months
MD 1.25 [0.89, 1.61]2 studiesUngraded
Change in gingival recession
>=12 months
MD -0.33 [-0.43, -0.23]1 studyUngraded
Change in probing depth (probing depth reduction)
>=12 months
MD 1.24 [0.89, 1.59]2 studiesUngraded
Hard tissue probing at surgical re-entry (bone gain)
>=12 months
MD 3.37 [3.14, 3.61]1 studyUngraded