Same question across reviews · CL0286

intervention :: Unclassified intervention -> Diagnostic accuracy

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
16
Questions
82
current versions
GRADE rated
15
Review overlap (CCA)
NR
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Periodontal treatment: scaling and root planing (SRP) plus advice vs Community care: advice only
Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) · People with cardiovascular disease and chronic periodontitis · 12 months
Periodontal therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with periodontitis (2022) · Cochrane
Serum hs-CRP tested at one year; as loss to follow-up was almost 90%, data not considered useful for analysis (no usable estimate).1 study · 37 participantsUngraded
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at operator's submental region (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD 0.52 [-0.11, 1.16]1 study · 47 participantsUngraded
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at operator's occiput (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD 0.77 [-0.46, 2.00]1 study · 47 participantsVery low
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at 2 metres from mouth (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -11.70 [-15.82, -7.58]1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at 2 metres from mouth (CCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -2.80 [-4.65, -0.95]1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at 1 metre from mouth (CCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -10.10 [-19.72, -0.48]1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at operator's left ear (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD 0.96 [-0.08, 2.00]1 study · 47 participantsUngraded
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at operator's forehead (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD 0.98 [-0.73, 2.70]1 study · 47 participantsVery low
Rubber dam + HVE vs Cotton roll + HVE
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at dental unit light · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -12.70 [-12.85, -12.55]1 study · 21 participantsVery low
Rubber dam vs No rubber dam
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at 1 metre from mouth (RCT) · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -16.20 [-19.36, -13.04]1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Rubber dam + HVE vs Cotton roll + HVE
Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU) during restorative procedures at participant's chest · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting
Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious… (2020) · Cochrane
MD -251.00 [-267.95, -234.05]1 study · 21 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with thumb vs Sham (dummy) acupressure
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.50, 1.46]1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Acupuncture at P6 point vs Sham acupuncture
Successful completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.78 [1.05, 3.01]2 studies · 59 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with device plus sedation vs Sham (dummy) acupressure with sedation
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.16 [0.90, 1.48]1 study · 27 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with device vs Sham (dummy) acupressure
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 2.63 [1.33, 5.18]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Acupuncture at P6 point with sedation vs Sham (dummy) acupuncture with sedation
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.91, 1.28]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with sea band plus sedation vs Sham (dummy) acupressure with sedation
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.67, 1.17]1 study · 21 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with sea band vs Sham (dummy) acupressure
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.80 [0.63, 5.16]1 study · 19 participantsVery low
Acupressure at P6 point with thumb plus sedation vs Sham (dummy) acupressure with sedation
Completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.84, 1.10]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Participants' experience of the procedures · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
No data from the included studies were available.0 studiesNo studies
Low polymerization shrinkage resin composite (silorane, ormocer, bulk-fill or other modified-monomer composite) vs Conventional methacrylate-based resin composite
Postoperative sensitivity · People with permanent posterior teeth restored with class I or II direct restorations · 12 months
Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage… (2018)
OR 1.65 [0.71, 3.81]10 studies · 970 participantsUngraded
GTR rm + CAF vs GTR nrm + CAF
Patients' preference for a specific procedure · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Roccuzzo 1996: all patients preferred the GTR treatment because it was a single-step procedure1 studyUngraded
Any surgical or non-surgical technique or material used for the treatment of post-extraction bleeding vs Another active intervention, placebo, or no treatment
Patient-reported outcomes related to pain or discomfort during the procedure · People of any age and either gender with post-extraction bleeding, regardless of type of teeth (anterior or posterior,…
Interventions for treating post‐extraction bleeding (2018) · Cochrane
No data are available as no RCTs have been conducted on interventions to treat post-extraction bleeding0 studiesNo studies
Low polymerization shrinkage resin composite (silorane, ormocer, bulk-fill or other modified-monomer composite) vs Conventional methacrylate-based resin composite
Postoperative sensitivity · People with permanent posterior teeth restored with class I or II direct restorations · 24 months
Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage… (2018)
Six articles (seven experimental groups) evaluated postoperative sensitivity after 24 months; four showed no sensitivity in either group and three favored the control group, but the overall meta-analytic effect was not…6 studiesUngraded
GTR rm + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Patients' preference for a specific procedure · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Wang 2001: participants reported greater overall satisfaction with GTR rm than SCTG (reduced treatment time, no need for a second surgical site)1 studyUngraded
Zinc supplements (zinc sulphate, zinc gluconate, zinc picolinate, zinc acetate, or polaprezinc) vs Placebo
Taste acuity improvement - objective outcome (continuous) - taste detection (cross-over trial) · Patients with taste disturbances (dysgeusia/hypogeusia; idiopathic, zinc-deficient, or secondary to chronic renal… · 6 months, Children with chronic renal failure
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2017) · Cochrane
MD 2.50 [0.93, 4.07]1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Bone substitute (anorganic bovine bone / Bio-Oss) vs A different bone substitute
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients undergoing two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation · 1 year after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
Augmentation procedure failure 0/11 versus 0/11; none.1 study · 11 participantsUngraded
Maxillary sinus lift (augmentation) with long implants vs Short implants (5 to 8.5 mm) without sinus augmentation
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients with missing teeth and an atrophic posterior maxilla, with residual bone height between 4 and 9 mm below the… · 1 year after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
One bilateral augmentation failure occurred in one trial only (Felice 2011).1 studyUngraded
Rotary instruments to open the lateral sinus window vs Piezosurgery to open the lateral sinus window
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients undergoing lateral-window maxillary sinus lift · 1 year after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
Rickert 2013 (N = 36): no augmentation procedure failures.1 study · 36 participantsUngraded
Hand mallet (osteotomes) vs Electric mallet
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients undergoing one-stage crestal maxillary sinus lift without bone grafts (baseline residual bone height about… · 19 months to 3 years after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
Augmentation failures 0/40 versus 0/40; none.1 study · 80 participantsUngraded
Sinus lift with bone graft (granular Bio-Oss) vs Sinus lift without bone graft (Inion resorbable rigid barrier maintaining space / no bone)
Augmentation procedure failure · Patients with an atrophic maxillary sinus requiring augmentation (1 to 5 mm residual bone height) · 1 year after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.48 [0.04, 5.67]1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
One-stage crestal-approach sinus lift with autogenous bone and 8 mm implants vs Lateral-window sinus lift with 50% autogenous bone/50% Bio-Oss and implants at least 10 mm long
Augmentation (graft) procedure failure · Patients with 3 to 6 mm of residual bone height at the sinus floor · 5 years after loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.18 [0.01, 4.01]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening
Stage at diagnosis (early-stage detection) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of… · 15-year follow-up
Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.70, 0.93]1 study · 523 participantsUngraded
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening
Test performance (sensitivity and specificity) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of… · 15-year follow-up
Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer (2013) · Cochrane
Across the four cycles (15 years), the reported sensitivity of the visual examination in detecting oral cancer was 67.4% (188/279). No information on the specificity or the positive predictive value of the programme…1 studyUngraded
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening
Stage at diagnosis (early-stage detection) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of… · 15-year follow-up, High-risk individuals (tobacco and/or alcohol users)
Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer (2013) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.71, 0.95]1 study · 486 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with EDTA 17% vs Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with MTAD
Mean change in health-related quality of life or participant-expressed satisfaction with the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with MTAD final rinse vs Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with normal saline final rinse
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2.5% to 5.25% vs Chlorhexidine, 0.2% to 2% (solution or gel)
Proportion of participants or samples with positive bacterial growth culture, up to 72 hours after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.34, 1.56]2 studies · 62 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with EDTA 17% vs Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with MTAD
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5% (also 2.5%) vs Sodium hypochlorite 1%
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Normal saline
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.27, 2.5]1 study · 178 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with MTAD final rinse vs Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with normal saline final rinse
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain up to 6 hours after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5% vs Sodium hypochlorite 5% with proteolytic enzyme
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.6, 1.5]1 study · 166 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Normal saline
Proportion of participants or samples with positive bacterial growth culture, up to 72 hours after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5% vs Sodium hypochlorite 5% with proteolytic enzyme
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
None of the participants in either intervention group reported moderate to severe pain persisting after day 2.1 study · 166 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with hydrogen peroxide 3% vs Normal saline
Mean change in health-related quality of life or participant-expressed satisfaction with the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5% (also 2.5%) vs Sodium hypochlorite 1%
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with hydrogen peroxide 3%
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2.5% to 5.25% vs Chlorhexidine, 0.2% to 2% (solution or gel)
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain up to 6 hours after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Normal saline
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain up to 6 hours after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

All 82 questions, with filters