Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,000 questions in 69 reviews · Urology

current versions
No studies 196 · 19.6%Ungraded 33 · 3.3%Very low 198 · 19.8%Low 354 · 35.4%Moderate 206 · 20.6%High 13 · 1.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.91 [0.72, 1.16]1 study · 435 participantsLow
Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2 [1.4, 2.85]1 study · 435 participantsHigh
Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)
Health‐related quality of life · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 300 participantsHigh
Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Health‐related quality of life (mean change value) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 467 participantsLow
Tivozanib vs sorafenib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)
Progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.79 [0.64, 0.99]1 study · 517 participantsLow
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Time to death from any cause · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.64 [0.56, 0.73]2 studies · 2201 participantsHigh
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐prostate [FACT‐P; range 0 to 156; higher values = better quality of life]) measured at 12 months · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 838 participantsModerate
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Grades III to V adverse events (severe and life threatening, as per the Common Toxicity Criteria v3.0; ) measured at a median · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.34 [1.22, 1.47]1 study · 1199 participantsHigh
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Time to death due to prostate cancer measured at a median · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.58 [0.5, 0.68]2 studies · 2201 participantsModerate
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Time to disease progression measured at a median · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.35 [0.26, 0.49]2 studies · 2097 participantsModerate
Abiraterone + ADT vs ADT alone
Discontinued treatment due to adverse events measured at a median · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.5 [1.17, 1.92]1 study · 1199 participantsModerate
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Urologic symptom score · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 195 participantsLow
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Quality of life · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 195 participantsModerate
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Major adverse events · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 6.79 [0.39, 117]1 study · 197 participantsVery low
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Retreatment · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.06, 32.86]1 study · 197 participantsVery low
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Erectile function · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 130 participantsLow
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
Ejaculatory function · lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 130 participantsLow
Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care
Stone clearance assessed by imaging · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted36 studies · 4084 participantsLow
Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care
Auxiliary treatment · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 1251 participantsLow
Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care
Major adverse events determined by study investigators · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 747 participantsLow
Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care
Quality of life · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alpha‐blocker as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy plus usual care vs usual care
Stone clearance time measured in days · adults with renal and ureteral stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy
Alpha‐blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted14 studies · 1790 participantsLow
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Urinary continence within 1 week after catheter removal MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.74 [1.41, 2.14]4 studies · 410 participantsModerate
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Urinary continence 3 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [1.06, 1.68]5 studies · 526 participantsLow
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Serious adverse events · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.47, 4.17]2 studies · 230 participantsVery low
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Urinary continence 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.97, 1.04]2 studies · 222 participantsModerate
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Potency 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.54, 1.8]1 study · 55 participantsVery low
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Positive surgical margins MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.95 [1.19, 3.2]3 studies · 308 participantsLow
Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP
Biochemical recurrence‐free survival · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer
Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… (2020) · Cochrane
HR 0.45 [0.13, 1.6]2 studies · 218 participantsVery low
Early vs deferred AST
Time to death of any cause (here: all‐cause mortality at 5 years) · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.82 [0.75, 0.9]10 studies · 4767 participantsModerate
Early vs deferred AST
Serious adverse events · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.95, 1.16]5 studies · 10575 participantsLow
Early vs deferred AST
Time to death from prostate cancer (here: prostate cancer mortality at 5 years) · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
HR 0.69 [0.57, 0.84]7 studies · 3677 participantsModerate
Early vs deferred AST
Skeletal events · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.17, 0.8]3 studies · 2209 participantsLow
Early vs deferred AST
Fatigue · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.41 [1.23, 1.62]2 studies · 8209 participantsLow
Early vs deferred AST
Heart failure · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.9 [1.09, 3.33]1 study · 1214 participantsLow
Early vs deferred AST
Global quality of life · advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 285 participantsModerate
BTURP vs MTURP
Urological symptoms (IPSSa at 12 monthsa) · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted16 studies · 2531 participantsModerate
BTURP vs MTURP
Bother (HRQoLc at 12 months) · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 2004 participantsModerate
BTURP vs MTURP
TUR syndrome · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.17 [0.09, 0.3]44 studies · 6745 participantsModerate
BTURP vs MTURP
Urinary incontinence at 12 months · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.01, 4.06]4 studies · 751 participantsLow
BTURP vs MTURP
Blood transfusion · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.42 [0.3, 0.59]38 studies · 5727 participantsModerate
BTURP vs MTURP
Re‐TURP · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.44, 2.4]6 studies · 652 participantsLow
BTURP vs MTURP
Erectile function (IIEF‐5e score at 12 months) · men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary… (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 321 participantsModerate
Postoperative parenteral nutrition vs oral nutrition alone
Complications
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [1.07, 1.82]1 study · 157 participantsLow
Early postoperative feeding vs standard management
Complications
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.85, 1.53]1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Early postoperative feeding vs standard management
Length of hospital stay
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsLow
Early postoperative feeding vs standard management
Mortality
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.52 [0.1, 2.71]1 study · 102 participantsLow
Amino acid solution, alone or in combination with dextrose vs dextrose solution
Complications
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.32, 1.82]2 studies · 104 participantsVery low
Amino acid solution, alone or in combination with dextrose vs dextrose solution
Length of hospital stay
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsVery low
Amino acid solution, alone or in combination with dextrose vs dextrose solution
Mortality
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low