Cochrane · systematic review · CD013251

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Kang, TW, Jung, JH, Hwang, EC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library

UrologyAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 33.3%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy compared to sham procedure for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Population: lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Urologic symptom score
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
no estimate extracted1 study · 195 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of life
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
no estimate extracted1 study · 195 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Major adverse events
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
RR 6.79 [0.39, 117]1 study · 197 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Retreatment
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
RR 1.36 [0.06, 32.86]1 study · 197 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Erectile function
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
no estimate extracted1 study · 130 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Ejaculatory function
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy vs sham procedure
no estimate extracted1 study · 130 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias