Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,532 questions · 2,642 findings · 483 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 534 · 20.2%GRADE not reported 82 · 3.1%Very low 641 · 24.3%Low 807 · 30.5%Moderate 472 · 17.9%High 106 · 4%

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

Reduction in pain intensity · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 27 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

Range of Motion: flexion and extension · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 27 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

Strength: flexors and extensors · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 90 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings ‐ Hydrotherapy vs no exercise

Range of Motion: flexion and extension · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 20 participants
Very low

Summary of findings ‐ Hydrotherapy vs no exercise

Strength: knee flexor and extensor strength · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 20 participants
Very low

Exercise vs no intervention

Reduction in pain intensity · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Exercise vs no intervention

Range of Motion: flexion and extension · participants with haemophilia

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion

Perinatal death or severe morbidity · pregnant women with confirmed or suspected chorioamnionitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Maintenance of initial therapeutic response of at least 30% pain intensity reduction over baseline and continued treatment at 13 or 26 weeks (equivalent to 'moderate benefit') · adults with fibromyalgia enrolled in EERW studies

1 finding from 1 review

Pregabalin for pain in fibromyalgia in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 687 participants
High

Myo‐inositol vs placebo

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy · women with gestational diabetes mellitus

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary supplementation with myo‐inositol in women during pregnancy for treating gestational diabetes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

Change in pain intensity from baseline 100 mm VAS · people with chronic low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1354 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Sensitivity analysis: change in pain intensity from baseline 100 mm VAS · people with chronic low back pain

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 728 participants
Moderate

NSAIDs vs placebo

Change in pain intensity from baseline on VAS (0 to 100) short‐term · people with low back pain with sciatica

It is very uncertain whether NSAIDs changes change in pain intensity from baseline on VAS (0 to 100) short‐term compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for sciatica 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 918 participants
Very low

Balneotherapy vs placebo

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 45 participants
Very low

Additional radon in carbon dioxide baths vs carbon dioxide baths only

Improvement More than 1 category change in pain intensity on 4‐point scale (no pain/sporadic/daily/continuous) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Additional radon in carbon dioxide baths showed no clear difference in improvement More than 1 category change in pain intensity on 4‐point… compared with carbon dioxide baths only (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.38 [0.64, 2.93]
1 study · 60 participants
Low
Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.29 [1.1, 4.74]
1 study · 60 participants
Low

Balneotherapy vs drug treatment

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

1 finding from 1 review

Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 57 participants
Very low

Additional radon in carbon dioxide baths vs carbon dioxide baths only

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2 findings from 1 review

Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 194 participants
Moderate
Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 194 participants
Moderate

Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including pre‐eclampsia) · Pregnant women at low risk of complications

Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including pre‐eclampsia) compared with standard antenatal care visits (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.8, 1.12]
6 studies · 54108 participants
Low

Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented vs standard antenatal care visits

Admission to neonatal intensive care unit · Pregnant women at low risk of complications

Reduced number of antenatal care visits/goal‐oriented showed no clear difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission compared with standard antenatal care visits (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.79, 1.02]
5 studies · 43048 participants
Moderate

Low‐back pain: any exercises + usual prenatal care vs usual prenatal care

Pain intensity measured by a number of different measurements; lower score = better. · pregnant women with back pain

Low‐back pain: any exercises + usual prenatal care showed no clear difference in pain intensity measured by a number of different measurements; lower… compared with usual prenatal care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing and treating low‐back and pelvic pain during pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 645 participants
Low