Cochrane · systematic review · CD011622
Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis
Hofmeyr, GJ, Kiiza, JAK · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 40%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Amnioinfusion versus no amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis
Population: pregnant women with confirmed or suspected chorioamnionitis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Perinatal death or severe morbidity (neonatal encephalopathy, intraventricular haemorrhage, admission to intensive/high care) Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Postpartum endometritis Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion | RR 1.5 [0.29, 7.87] | 1 study · 34 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Neonatal infection Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion | RR 3 [0.13, 68.84] | 1 study · 34 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Caesarean section Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion | RR 1 [0.35, 2.83] | 1 study · 34 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |
Low Apgar score at five minutes (less than seven or as defined by trial authors) Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |