Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

866 questions in 43 reviews · Oral and maxillofacial surgery

current versions
No studies 188 · 21.7%Ungraded 548 · 63.3%Very low 81 · 9.4%Low 37 · 4.3%Moderate 8 · 0.9%High 4 · 0.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Occlusal splint vs No treatment or placebo (non-occlusal or transparent-foil placebo splint)
Recurrence rate · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 1 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison. Recurrence rate was not reported in any included study across the whole review.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Severity of joint noise · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 4 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Physical therapy (ultrasound, exercise, sensorimotor training, laser, TENS, manual therapy)
Muscle pain at rest · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (mean 4.4 weeks), Myofascial pain TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.19 [-1.25, 0.87]1 study · 72 participantsVery low
Extraction of the mandibular permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)
Rotation of the mandibular second permanent molar · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
Prevalence 76.9 [15.5, 98.4]2 studies · 108 participantsUngraded
Second molar at Demirjian stage E at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage F-H at extraction
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 3.81 [1.85, 7.83]3 studies · 94 participantsLow
Occlusal splint vs Acupuncture
Severity of joint noise · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 5 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Dental crowding present vs Dental spacing present
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent… · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Overall
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 5.9 [1.3, 27.7]1 studyUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Acupuncture
Frequency of joint noise · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 5 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Physical therapy (ultrasound, exercise, sensorimotor training, laser, TENS, manual therapy)
Discomfort · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 3 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs No treatment or placebo (non-occlusal or transparent-foil placebo splint)
Self-reported joint pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (10 weeks), Mixed TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.88 [0.94, 3.75]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Spontaneous space closure · Maxilla: M2 Demirjian E-F vs G-H
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 8.01 studyUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Participant satisfaction or quality of life · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (3 months), Mixed TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -2.29 [-3.13, -1.45]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Extraction of the permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent… · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Overall (both jaws)
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
Prevalence 61.6 [50.2, 71.9]13 studies · 1787 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Physical therapy (ultrasound, exercise, sensorimotor training, laser, TENS, manual therapy)
Somatisation · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term, Disc displacement with reduction (DDwR)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.18 [-0.45, 0.09]1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Cleft lip and palate vs No cleft lip and palate
Streptococcus mutans mean levels/counts · Children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
SMD 1.78 [1.36, 2.19]2 studies · 175 participantsUngraded
Extraction of the mandibular permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)
Rotation of the mandibular first premolar · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
Prevalence 37.8 [0.7, 98.2]2 studies · 109 participantsUngraded
M2 Demirjian stages A-D vs M2 Demirjian stages F-H
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents with maxillary permanent first molar extraction · Follow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molar, Maxilla
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR >100.00 [0.02, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded
Non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) status and its oral microbiota (exposure/grouping) vs Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years without CLP (controls)
Periodontal/gingival clinical status (gingival index, biofilm index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, attachment loss) · Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP)
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
Six studies (Ahluwalia, Rawashdeh, Funahashi, Perdikogianni, Quirynen, Costa) reported that patients with CLP had higher gingival index and biofilm/plaque index, deeper probing depth, more bleeding on probing and…6 studiesUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Discomfort · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 4 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Discomfort · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 2 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Participant satisfaction or quality of life · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (1 month), Mixed TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -1.42 [-15.78, 12.94]2 studies · 73 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs No treatment or placebo (non-occlusal or transparent-foil placebo splint)
Muscle pain at rest · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (mean 2 months), Myofascial pain TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -11.63 [-29.37, 6.11]1 study · 37 participantsVery low
Occlusal splint vs Physical therapy (ultrasound, exercise, sensorimotor training, laser, TENS, manual therapy)
Range of mandibular motion · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (3 months), Disc displacement with reduction (DDwR)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD -0.33 [-3.31, 2.65]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Muscle pain at rest · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 2 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Zinc oxide eugenol vs Alvogyl (old formulation)
Limitation of chewing or swallowing · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome0 studiesNo studies
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs Alternative (active) treatment (e.g. oral splint, medication, self-care or disease management)
Quality of life · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
This outcome was not measured (not synthesised for this comparison; review-wide only one study reported quality of life).NRNo studies
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs Alternative (active) treatment (e.g. oral splint, medication, self-care or disease management)
Pain intensity at treatment completion · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · Treatment completion
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
SMD 0.03 [-0.21, 0.28]5 studies · 509 participantsLow
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse events · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
No adverse events were reported. Six trials (673 participants) reported no adverse events from the use of chlorhexidine gel; one study (Rubio-Palau 2015) reported gastrointestinal discomfort (30, 18%), dizziness (10,…7 studiesUngraded
Neocone vs Alvogyl
Time to initial pain relief (minutes) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction · Initial pain relief
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
MD 9.87 [9.12, 10.63]1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Tranexamic acid (AMCA cones) vs Placebo (lactose cones)
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.30, 1.48]1 study · 120 participantsUngraded
Primary closure of the extraction socket with a mucoperiosteal flap vs Application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) without primary closure
Incidence of MRONJ · People on antiresorptive treatment undergoing tooth extraction (at risk of MRONJ) · 90 days
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane
All participants had complete mucosal coverage without any signs of MRONJ at the final control examination 90 days postoperatively (77 randomised; 1 RCT); no case of postoperative MRONJ in either group; effect not…1 study · 77 participantsUngraded
Relaxation vs Occlusal (oral) appliance
Pain intensity · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · Treatment completion, Adolescents (12-19 years)
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
Not pooled. Wahlund 2015: MD 3.70 (95% CI -1.21 to 8.61), n=57 (relaxation 28, appliance 29); Wahlund 2003: MD not reported, n=83 (relaxation 41, appliance 42). Both studies were in adolescents; the occlusal appliance…2 studies · 140 participantsUngraded
Clindamycin phosphate antibiotic solution patch vs Saline patch
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
OR (exact) 0 [0, 0.69]1 study · 86 participantsUngraded
Apernyl (acetylsalicylic acid pellet) vs Placebo
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.16]1 study · 100 participantsUngraded
Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) vs Control (no treatment)
Pain (VAS cm) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction · Days 1-7 (day 7 shown)
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
MD -3.60 [-4.00, -3.20]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%)
Adverse events · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
No adverse events were reported in these two trials (Abu-Mostafa 2015; Hita-Iglesias 2008).2 studiesUngraded
Zinc oxide eugenol vs Alvogyl (old formulation)
Swelling · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome0 studiesNo studies
SaliCept (acemannan hydrogel) vs No treatment
Pain (VAS) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
SaliCept (acemannan hydrogel) versus No treatment (Kaya 2011): data not usable (medians presented with error bars). Text reports differences in clinical signs and symptoms between control and all 3 treatment groups…1 studyUngraded
Zinc oxide eugenol vs Alvogyl (old formulation)
Fever · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome0 studiesNo studies
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs Alternative (active) treatment (e.g. oral splint, medication, self-care or disease management)
Psychological distress at follow-up · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · Follow-up
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
SMD -0.32 [-0.51, -0.13]6 studies · 516 participantsLow
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) · Children in the primary dentition with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and comparable children without CL/P · Primary and mixed dentition
Caries in children with and without orofacial clefting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022)
SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76]5 studies · 708 participantsUngraded
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs Usual care, waiting list or no treatment (control)
Adverse events · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
Only 1 study reported adverse events as an outcome (Litt 2010): it found worsening symptoms in 13 people treated with an oral splint (as part of standard treatment) and 4 people treated with CBT.1 study · 101 participantsVery low
Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) vs Alvogyl
Exposed bone (present versus absent) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction · Day 7 (also day 3)
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
PRGF versus Alvogyl (King 2018), exposed bone (% patients): day 3 PRGF 9.1% vs Alvogyl 9.1%; day 7 PRGF 0% vs Alvogyl 22.7% (P<0.05 at day 7)1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Alvogyl vs SaliCept (acemannan hydrogel)
Pain (VAS) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
Alvogyl versus SaliCept (acemannan hydrogel) (Kaya 2011): data not usable (medians presented with error bars). Text reports differences in clinical signs and symptoms between control and all 3 treatment groups…1 studyUngraded
Dental extraction protocol with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) inserted into the postextraction alveolus vs Standard dental extraction protocol without PRGF
Rate of complications and side effects of the intervention · People with cancer treated with intravenous bisphosphonates undergoing dental extractions (at risk of MRONJ) · 24 to 60 months
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane
No intraoperative complications were observed in either of the groups.1 study · 176 participantsUngraded
Neocone vs Alvogyl
Time to complete resolution of pain (days) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction · Complete resolution of pain
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
MD -1.62 [-1.86, -1.38]1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Alvogyl vs Zinc oxide eugenol
Time to complete resolution of pain (days) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction · Complete resolution of pain
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
MD -2.17 [-2.37, -1.97]1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Teriparatide 20 microg daily in addition to standard care vs Placebo in addition to standard care
Healing of MRONJ (resolution of lesions) · People with established (manifest) MRONJ · 52 weeks
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.31, 2.95]1 study · 33 participantsLow
P-hydroxybenzoic acid vs Placebo
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.08 [0.00, 1.37]1 study · 45 participantsUngraded
Hope-based intervention vs Pain education
Pain intensity · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · Treatment completion
Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane
MD 0.10 [-13.52, 13.72]1 study · 29 participantsUngraded