Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM39380531

Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hamza Blend, Papageorgiou Spyridon N, Patcas Raphael, et al. · European journal of orthodontics · 2024 · PubMed · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjae054

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
31
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
18
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 24 · 77.4%Very low 0 · 0%Low 7 · 22.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren/adolescents (<18 years), any sex/ethnicity, with at least one permanent first molar extracted (either jaw) for any reason before emergence of the permanent second molar and followed to complete eruption of the second molar1159 patients (n=15 studies; ages 5.5-15.0 y, mean 10.0 y; 45% male) with 2310 permanent second molars assessed
InterventionExtraction of the permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent second molarExtraction of the permanent first molar (14 retrospective, 1 prospective cohort study)
ComparisonPrognostic-factor contrasts (jaw, patient age, second-molar developmental [Demirjian] stage, third molar presence, sex); no untreated/no-extraction controlPrognostic-factor contrasts meta-analyzed: maxilla vs mandible; age bands; Demirjian stages; third molar presence; sex; second-molar inclination
OutcomesPrevalence of spontaneous space closure (primary); eruption, position, inclination and rotation of the second molar and premolars; second-molar developmental stage; third molar presenceSpontaneous space closure prevalence (overall 61.6%, n=13; maxilla 85.3%, n=9; mandible 48.1%, n=11); mandibular second-molar and premolar rotations; pairwise ORs for prognostic factors (14 studies meta-analyzed)
Study designsAny clinical settingUniversity clinics and hospitals in 8 countries (Belgium, Canada, England, Norway, Palestine, Sweden, Turkey, USA)
TimingFollow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molarMedian follow-up 4.0 years

Search date: February 2024. Databases: Five electronic databases searched from inception to February 2024 (database names in Supplementary Appendix 2); reference and citation lists (Google Scholar) hand-searched

Questions and results

Extraction of the permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent second molar
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Maxilla
In the maxilla, spontaneous space closure occurred in about 85% of cases (9 studies; prevalence not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Fig. 2; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 85.3 [73.7, 92.3]9 studies · 665 participantsUngraded
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, spontaneous space closure occurred in about 48% of cases (11 studies; prevalence not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Fig. 2; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 48.1 [34.5, 62.0]11 studies · 1095 participantsUngraded
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Overall (both jaws)
Spontaneous space closure occurred in about 62% of cases overall after permanent first molar extraction (13 studies; prevalence not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Fig. 2; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 61.6 [50.2, 71.9]13 studies · 1787 participantsUngraded

Extraction of the mandibular permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Rotation of the mandibular second premolar
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
After mandibular first molar extraction, the second premolar was rotated in about 60% of cases (2 studies; very imprecise; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 60.0 [10.7, 95.0]2 studies · 105 participantsUngraded
Rotation of the mandibular second permanent molar
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
After mandibular first molar extraction, the second molar was rotated in about 77% of cases (2 studies; very imprecise; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 76.9 [15.5, 98.4]2 studies · 108 participantsUngraded
Rotation of the mandibular first premolar
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
After mandibular first molar extraction, the first premolar was rotated in about 38% of cases (2 studies; very imprecise; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Table 3; Results 'Data synthesis' · same question in other reviews
Prevalence 37.8 [0.7, 98.2]2 studies · 109 participantsUngraded

Extraction of a maxillary permanent first molar vs Extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent second molar
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Overall
Spontaneous space closure is much more likely in the maxilla than the mandible (OR 7.77; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 5 (SoF); Fig. 3 · same question in other reviews
OR 7.77 [4.99, 12.11]
395 [340, 434] per 1000 teeth (more)
9 studies · 1349 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Second molar at Demirjian stage E at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage F-H at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a maxillary permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Maxilla
In the maxilla, extraction at Demirjian stage E (vs later F-H) increases odds of space closure (OR 4.78; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 6 (SoF) · same question in other reviews
OR 4.78 [1.56, 14.66]
73 [32, 87] per 1000 teeth (more)
3 studies · 252 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Age 8-10 years vs Age >10 years

Population: Children and adolescents with maxillary permanent first molar extraction
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Follow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molar · Maxilla
In the maxilla, age 8-10 years was not associated with a statistically significant difference in space closure odds.
Source: Table 4; Results, Data synthesis · same question in other reviews
OR >100.00 [0.01, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded
Downgraded: risk of bias
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
In the mandible, extraction before age 8 (vs after 10) increases odds of space closure (OR 5.01; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 7 (SoF) · same question in other reviews
OR 5.01 [1.45, 17.30]
226 [73, 283] per 1000 teeth (more)
2 studies · 15 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Extraction at patient age 8-10 years vs Extraction at patient age >10 years

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, extraction at age 8-10 (vs after 10) increases odds of space closure (OR 3.32; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 7 (SoF) · same question in other reviews
OR 3.32 [1.73, 6.36]
179 [98, 252] per 1000 teeth (more)
3 studies · 109 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Spontaneous space closure
Follow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molar · Maxilla
Population: Children and adolescents with maxillary permanent first molar extraction
In the maxilla, M2 Demirjian stages A-D were not associated with a statistically significant difference in space closure odds.
Source: Table 4; Results, Data synthesis · same question in other reviews
OR >100.00 [0.02, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded
Downgraded: risk of bias

Extraction at patient age 11-12 years vs Extraction at patient age 8-10 years

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, extraction at 11-12 vs 8-10 years showed no significant difference in one analysis (OR 0.82; not GRADE-rated).
OR 0.82 [0.35, 1.88]2 studiesUngraded
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, a second Table 4 analysis suggested lower odds at 11-12 vs 8-10 years (OR 0.29; not GRADE-rated; source labeling ambiguous).
OR 0.29 [0.11, 0.81]2 studiesUngraded

M2 Demirjian stages F-G vs M2 Demirjian stages E-D

Population: Children and adolescents with maxillary permanent first molar extraction
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Follow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molar · Maxilla
In the maxilla, M2 Demirjian stages F-G were not associated with a statistically significant difference in space closure odds.
Source: Table 4; Results, Data synthesis · same question in other reviews
OR >100.00 [0.01, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded
Downgraded: risk of bias
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
In the mandible, mean patient age was not significantly associated with space closure odds (OR 0.59 per year; not GRADE-rated).
OR 0.59 [0.20, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded

Male sex vs Female sex

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, sex was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 1.38; not GRADE-rated).
OR 1.38 [0.37, 5.14]2 studiesUngraded

Second molar at Demirjian stage A-D at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage F-H at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, earlier Demirjian stage A-D (vs F-H) increases odds of space closure (OR 3.11; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 7 (SoF) · same question in other reviews
OR 3.11 [1.25, 7.72]
202 [49, 285] per 1000 teeth (more)
3 studies · 95 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Second molar at Demirjian stage A-D at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage G-H at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, Demirjian stage A-D vs G-H was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 2.75; not GRADE-rated).
OR 2.75 [0.50, 15.10]3 studiesUngraded

Second molar at Demirjian stage E at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage F-H at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, extraction at Demirjian stage E (vs later F-H) increases odds of space closure (OR 3.81; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 7 (SoF) · same question in other reviews
OR 3.81 [1.85, 7.83]
226 [125, 286] per 1000 teeth (more)
3 studies · 94 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Second molar at Demirjian stage E-F at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage G-H at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, Demirjian stage E-F vs G-H was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 4.44; not GRADE-rated).
OR 4.44 [0.43, 46.10]3 studiesUngraded

Second molar at Demirjian stage F-G at extraction vs Second molar at Demirjian stage D-E at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, Demirjian stage F-G vs D-E was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 0.68; not GRADE-rated).
OR 0.68 [0.28, 1.66]4 studiesUngraded

Second molar distally inclined at extraction vs Second molar upright at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, distal inclination of the second molar vs upright was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 1.18; not GRADE-rated).
OR 1.18 [0.43, 3.21]3 studiesUngraded

Second molar mesially inclined at extraction vs Second molar upright at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, mesial inclination of the second molar vs upright was not significantly associated with space closure (OR 0.68; not GRADE-rated).
OR 0.68 [0.27, 1.71]3 studiesUngraded

Mandibular third molar present vs Mandibular third molar absent

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
In the mandible, presence of the third molar increases odds of spontaneous space closure (OR 2.28; low certainty).
Source: Table 4; Table 7 (SoF); Fig. 4 · same question in other reviews
OR 2.28 [1.67, 3.09]
195 [126, 256] per 1000 teeth (more)
4 studies · 467 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Dental crowding present vs Dental spacing present

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent second molar
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Overall
One study found space closure more likely with crowding than spacing (OR 5.9; single study; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Results 'Data synthesis' (Supplementary Appendix 8) · same question in other reviews
OR 5.9 [1.3, 27.7]1 studyUngraded

Second molar at Nolla developmental stage 6-7 at extraction vs Second molar at later Nolla stages at extraction

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
One study found mandibular Nolla stage 6-7 associated with better space closure (OR 55.1; single study; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Results 'Data synthesis' (Supplementary Appendix 8) · same question in other reviews
OR 55.1 [3.0, at least 100.0]1 studyUngraded

Unilateral extraction of the mandibular first permanent molar vs Bilateral extraction of the mandibular first permanent molars

Population: Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Midline deviation of the mandibular arch
Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years) · Mandible
One study found midline deviation more likely after unilateral than bilateral extraction (OR 11.6; single study; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Results 'Data synthesis' (Supplementary Appendix 8) · same question in other reviews
OR 11.6 [1.9, 70.3]1 studyUngraded

Comparison

3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Spontaneous space closure
Maxilla: M2 Demirjian A-D vs G-H
OR >100.001 studyUngraded
Spontaneous space closure
Mandible: M2 Demirjian E-F vs G-H
OR 42.01 studyUngraded
Spontaneous space closure
Maxilla: M2 Demirjian E-F vs G-H
OR 8.01 studyUngraded

Included primary studies 18

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
Patel 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Rahhal 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Aldahool 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Aldahool 2024
Spontaneous space closure in patients treated with early extraction of the first permanent molar: a retrospective cohort study using…
PMID:38381800
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Brusevold 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Brusevold 2022
Extraction of first permanent molars severely affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation: a retrospective audit.
PMID:34170497
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Canpolat 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ciftci 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ciftci 2021
Spontaneous space closure following the extraction of the first permanent mandibular molar.
PMID:34657009
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ertugrul 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Gaudreau 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Jalevik 2007
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Lenaker 2022; 2023
Radiographic Evaluation of Predictors for Spontaneous Space Closure and Supereruption After the Loss of Permanent First Molars in Yup'ik…
PMID:37381127
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Mouroutsou 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Nordeen 2022
Radiographic Evaluation of Permanent Second Molar Substitution After Extraction of Permanent First Molar: Identifying Predictors for…
PMID:35484777
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Patel 2017
Radiographic prognostic factors determining spontaneous space closure after loss of the permanent first molar.
PMID:28364895
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Serindere 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Thilander 1970
Orthodontic sequelae of extraction of permanent first molars. A longitudinal study.
PMID:5287509
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match).