Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Rahhal 2014

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Rahhal 2014 · Table 1; Table 2; References [21]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Post-extraction space (spontaneous space closure / decrease in space) Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side	Spontaneous space closure ranged from 45.5% to 85.2% overall (maxilla 33.3% to 94%, mandible 50% to 75%). Table 3 conclusion: early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space (Category III…	6 studies	Ungraded

Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2024 · cited as Rahhal 2014 · Table 1

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.