Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,395 questions in 172 reviews · Gut

current versions
No studies 420 · 17.5%Ungraded 60 · 2.5%Very low 821 · 34.3%Low 602 · 25.1%Moderate 397 · 16.6%High 95 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
SEMS vs plastic tube (degree of concealment)
All major side effects (analysis by concealment of allocation) ‐ Concealment of allocation A · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.23 [0.13, 0.39]4 studies · 303 participantsModerate
SEMS vs plastic tube (degree of concealment)
All major side effects (analysis by concealment of allocation) ‐ Concealment of allocation non‐A · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.25 [0.1, 0.65]3 studies · 110 participantsModerate
Anti‐reflux vs standard open stent
Dysphagia improvement · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 106 participantsModerate
Anti‐reflux vs standard open stent
All adverse effects · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.86 [0.38, 1.94]2 studies · 106 participantsModerate
Brachytherapy vs brachytherapy plus radiotherapy
Adverse effects · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.17 [0.44, 3.15]2 studies · 554 participantsModerate
Brachytherapy vs brachytherapy plus radiotherapy
Adverse effects ‐ stricture · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.43 [0.16, 12.85]2 studies · 277 participantsHigh
SEMS vs plastic tube (main analysis)
Persistent or recurrent dysphagia · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.41 [0.2, 0.85]7 studies · 433 participantsHigh
SEMS vs plastic tube (main analysis)
All major adverse effects · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.25 [0.16, 0.39]7 studies · 433 participantsModerate
SEMS vs laser
Persistent or recurrent dysphagia · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.67 [0.3, 1.54]2 studies · 125 participantsHigh
SEMS vs laser
Interventions for recurrent dysphagia · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.27 [0.12, 0.6]2 studies · 125 participantsHigh
SEMS vs laser
Adverse effects ‐ All adverse effects · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 2.26 [0.96, 5.33]2 studies · 125 participantsModerate
Laser vs plastic tube
Dysphagia improvement · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 3.22 [0.78, 13.37]2 studies · 80 participantsModerate
Laser vs plastic tube
Recurrent dysphagia · patients with dysphagia in oesophageal cancer
Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer (2014) · Cochrane
OR 2.89 [0.02, 461.22]2 studies · 80 participantsHigh
Epinephrine vs epinephrine and any second endoscopic method
Recurrent and persistent bleeding overall rates with or without second‐look endoscopy Rebleeding (persistent or recurrent bleeding) · patients with high‐risk bleeding ulcers
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high‐risk bleeding ulcers (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.5719 studies · 1926 participantsModerate
Epinephrine vs epinephrine and any second endoscopic method
Surgery rate Number requiring emergency surgery · patients with high‐risk bleeding ulcers
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high‐risk bleeding ulcers (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.6818 studies · 1841 participantsModerate
Epinephrine vs epinephrine and any second endoscopic method
Mortality rate Number of deaths (30‐day mortality or in‐hospital mortality) · patients with high‐risk bleeding ulcers
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high‐risk bleeding ulcers (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.6418 studies · 1841 participantsModerate
Epinephrine vs epinephrine and any second endoscopic method
Adverse effects of endoscopy therapy Adverse effects · patients with high‐risk bleeding ulcers
Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high‐risk bleeding ulcers (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.2512 studies · 1281 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Relapse rate at one year (all studies) · Crohn's disease patients in remission
Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.61, 0.98]6 studies · 1039 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Relapse rate at one year (sensitivity analysis of Belluzi 1996) · Crohn's disease patients in remission
Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.64, 0.93]5 studies · 904 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Relapse rate at one year (only EPIC studies) · Crohn's disease patients in remission
Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.74, 1.05]2 studies · 738 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events rate‐Diarrhea · Crohn's disease patients in remission
Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [1.01, 1.84]4 studies · 862 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events rate‐ Upper GI (nausea, vomiting, halitosis, heartburn, dyspepsia, dysgeusia and bloating) · Crohn's disease patients in remission
Omega 3 fatty acids (fish oil) for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.98 [1.38, 2.85]5 studies · 999 participantsModerate
Methotrexate vs placebo
Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids · patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.58, 1.59]1 study · 67 participantsLow
Methotrexate vs 6‐mercaptopurine
Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission · patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.43, 1.29]1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Methotrexate vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA)
Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission · patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2.33 [0.66, 3.64]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Tranexamic acid vs placebo
Mortality Clinical · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 studies · 1701 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs placebo
Rebleeding Clinical and endoscopic assessment · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.727 studies · 1651 participantsLow
Tranexamic acid vs placebo
Any thromboembolic event Clinical and radiological assessment · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.864 studies · 1095 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs placebo
Surgery Number of participants who underwent surgery · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.617 studies · 1551 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs placebo
Transfusion Number needing blood transfusion · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.025 studies · 931 participantsVery low
Tranexamic acid vs cimetidine or lansoprazole
Mortality Number of participants who died · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.912 studies · 720 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs cimetidine or lansoprazole
Rebleeding Clinical and endoscopic assessment · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.872 studies · 720 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs cimetidine or lansoprazole
Surgery Number of participants who underwent surgery · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.832 studies · 720 participantsModerate
Tranexamic acid vs cimetidine or lansoprazole
Transfusion Number of participants who required at least 1 blood transfusion · patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.972 studies · 720 participantsLow
Methotrexate vs placebo
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission · patients with quiescent Crohn's disease
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.57 [1.1, 2.23]2 studies · 98 participantsModerate
Methotrexate vs placebo
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission (high dose intramuscular methotrexate 15 mg/week) · patients with quiescent Crohn's disease
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [1.05, 2.67]1 study · 76 participantsModerate
Methotrexate vs placebo
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission (low dose oral methotrexate 12.5 mg/week) · patients with quiescent Crohn's disease
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.35 [0.86, 2.12]1 study · 22 participantsLow
Methotrexate vs 6‐mercaptopurine
Proportion of patients maintaining clinical remission · patients with quiescent Crohn's disease
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.92, 2]2 studies · 50 participantsVery low
Methotrexate + infliximab vs Infliximab +/‐ placebo
Proportion of patients maintaining remission · patients with maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease
Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.76, 1.38]2 studies · 145 participantsLow
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Failure to induce clinical remission · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.8, 0.91]4 studies · 606 participantsHigh
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Failure to induce clinical response · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.59, 0.78]3 studies · 601 participantsModerate
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Failure to induce endoscopic remission · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.75, 0.91]3 studies · 583 participantsHigh
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Clinical relapse · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.59, 0.77]1 study · 373 participantsModerate
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Endoscopic relapse · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.49, 0.68]1 study · 373 participantsModerate
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Adverse events · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.93, 1.07]2 studies · 941 participantsHigh
Vedolizumab vs placebo
Serious adverse events · Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis
Vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.72, 1.42]3 studies · 1122 participantsModerate
Etoricoxib vs placebo
Exacerbation of IBD · patients with active or quiescent IBD
Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.45, 1.69]1 study · 159 participantsLow
Celecoxib vs placebo
Exacerbation of ulcerative colitis · patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.23, 2.14]1 study · 222 participantsLow
Celecoxib vs placebo
GI adverse events · patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors used for the treatment of rheumatological… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.46, 2.07]1 study · 221 participantsLow
Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Mortality Clinical manifestation · patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [0.49, 3.39]3 studies · 633 participantsHigh