Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,434 questions in 139 reviews · Kidney and Transplant

current versions
No studies 504 · 20.7%Ungraded 40 · 1.6%Very low 611 · 25.1%Low 790 · 32.5%Moderate 414 · 17%High 75 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Steroid withdrawal vs steroid maintenance
Mortality · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.36, 1.3]10 studies · 1913 participantsLow
Steroid avoidance vs steroid maintenance
CMV Infection · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.7, 1.31]6 studies · 1454 participantsLow
Steroid withdrawal vs steroid maintenance
Graft loss (excluding death) · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.72, 1.92]8 studies · 1817 participantsLow
Steroid withdrawal vs steroid maintenance
Acute rejection · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.77 [1.2, 2.61]10 studies · 1913 participantsModerate
Steroid withdrawal vs steroid maintenance
NODAT · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.49, 1.21]6 studies · 1439 participantsLow
Steroid withdrawal vs steroid maintenance
CMV infection · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.8, 1.36]5 studies · 1758 participantsLow
Steroid avoidance vs steroid maintenance
Mortality · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.52, 1.8]10 studies · 1462 participantsLow
Steroid avoidance vs steroid maintenance
Graft loss (excluding death) · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.64, 1.86]7 studies · 1211 participantsLow
Steroid avoidance vs steroid maintenance
Acute rejection · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.58 [1.08, 2.3]7 studies · 835 participantsModerate
Steroid avoidance vs steroid maintenance
NODAT · kidney transplant recipients
Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.51, 1.1]9 studies · 1618 participantsLow
Dialysis machine separation vs usual care
Incidence of HCV infection (9 months) · patients in haemodialysis
Isolation as a strategy for controlling the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.34 [0.11, 1.07]1 study · 446 participantsVery low
Dialysis machine separation vs usual care
Incidence of HCV infection (18 months) · patients in haemodialysis
Isolation as a strategy for controlling the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.05, 1.02]1 study · 281 participantsVery low
Manual acupressure vs routine care
Pain1 Not measured · patients with end‐stage kidney disease
Acupuncture and related interventions for symptoms of chronic kidney disease (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Manual acupressure vs routine care
Depression Beck's Depression Inventory Scale from: 0 to 63 · patients with end‐stage kidney disease
Acupuncture and related interventions for symptoms of chronic kidney disease (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 128 participantsVery low
Manual acupressure vs routine care
Sleep quality Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index6 Scale from: 0 to 21 · patients with end‐stage kidney disease
Acupuncture and related interventions for symptoms of chronic kidney disease (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 180 participantsVery low
Manual acupressure vs routine care
Fatigue Revised Piper Fatigue Scale Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with end‐stage kidney disease
Acupuncture and related interventions for symptoms of chronic kidney disease (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 128 participantsVery low
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality at day 30 · patients with AKI
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.81, 1.1]5 studies · 2402 participantsLow
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality after 30 days post‐randomisation · patients with AKI
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.8, 1.06]5 studies · 2759 participantsLow
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT · patients with AKI
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.91, 1.37]5 studies · 2402 participantsLow
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Patients free of RRT after discontinuing CRRT · patients with AKI
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.94, 1.01]3 studies · 988 participantsModerate
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Adverse events: hypophosphataemia · patients with AKI
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [1.11, 1.31]1 study · 1441 participantsHigh
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality: patients with sepsis · patients with AKI who need CRRT
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.69, 1.27]5 studies · 966 participantsLow
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality: patients without sepsis · patients with AKI who need CRRT
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.69, 1.15]4 studies · 1216 participantsLow
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality: patients with AKI related to cardiac or general surgery · patients with AKI who need CRRT
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.61, 0.88]2 studies · 531 participantsHigh
Intensive vs less intensive continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Mortality: patients with AKI not related to surgery · patients with AKI who need CRRT
Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.73, 1.2]3 studies · 1871 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Ultrasound · of 1000 children
Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan or ultrasound in screening for vesicoureteral reflux among children with… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 2498 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
DMSA · of 1000 children
Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan or ultrasound in screening for vesicoureteral reflux among children with… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 2499 participantsUngraded
Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone
Risk of access thrombosis · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.
Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.8, 1.12]8 studies · 697 participantsModerate
Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone
Rate of angiograms · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.
Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.78 [1.18, 2.67]5 studies · 539 participantsLow
Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone
Risk of access loss · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.
Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.71, 1.15]6 studies · 662 participantsModerate
Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone
Mortality · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis.
Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.38 [0.9, 2.11]5 studies · 586 participantsLow
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality · men and women with end‐stage kidney disease
Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end‐stage kidney disease (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.72, 1.05]11 studies · 3396 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Cardiovascular mortality · men and women with end‐stage kidney disease
Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end‐stage kidney disease (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.81, 0.92]6 studies · 2889 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Nonfatal cardiovascular events · men and women with end‐stage kidney disease
Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end‐stage kidney disease (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.232 studies · 1688 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Health‐related quality of life · men and women with end‐stage kidney disease
Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end‐stage kidney disease (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 988 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mortality · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.5, 1.15]3 studies · 163 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serum bicarbonate (mmol/L) · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 163 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Serum creatinine (µmol/L) · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 137 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Serum lactate (mmol/L) · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 171 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serum base excess · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 145 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Serum pH · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 171 participantsLow
Intervention NR
pCO2 · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 151 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Hypotensive events · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.26, 0.75]1 study · 20 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Cardiovascular complications · patients with acute kidney injury
Bicarbonate‐ versus lactate‐buffered solutions for acute continuous haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.391 study · 20 participantsModerate
Preoperative vessel imaging by ultrasound mapping vs standard preoperative care
Fistulas created Assessed by surgeon¹ · HD patients with arteriovenous fistulas
Preoperative vascular access evaluation for haemodialysis patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.94, 1.12]4 studies · 433 participantsVery low
Preoperative vessel imaging by ultrasound mapping vs standard preoperative care
Fistulas matured Clinical assessment by experienced HD nurse⁴ · HD patients with arteriovenous fistulas
Preoperative vascular access evaluation for haemodialysis patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.98, 1.25]3 studies · 356 participantsLow
Preoperative vessel imaging by ultrasound mapping vs standard preoperative care
Fistulas used for dialysis Clinical assessment by HD nurse · HD patients with arteriovenous fistulas
Preoperative vascular access evaluation for haemodialysis patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.99, 1.28]2 studies · 286 participantsLow
Preoperative vessel imaging by ultrasound mapping vs standard preoperative care
Rate of interventions required to maintain patency (per 1000 patient‐days) · HD patients with arteriovenous fistulas
Preoperative vascular access evaluation for haemodialysis patients (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs azathioprine (AZA)
Death, all cause · patients with kidney transplant recipients
Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.7, 1.29]16 studies · 2987 participantsModerate
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs azathioprine (AZA)
Graft loss, censored for death · patients with kidney transplant recipients
Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.61, 0.98]17 studies · 2540 participantsHigh