Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Mean change from baseline in quality of life score (NEI VFQ‐25 instrument) · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 153 participantsModerate
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
74 questions · 74 findings · 25 reviews · Eyes and Vision
No studies found 13 · 17.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 21 · 28.4%Low 20 · 27%Moderate 20 · 27%High 0 · 0%
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Quality of life Measured using the NEI‐RQL‐42. Higher scores are better quality of life. · school‐age children and adolescents
1 finding from 1 review
- Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 188 participantsModerate
Immediate cataract surgery vs delayed cataract surgery
Mean postoperative best‐corrected visual acuity · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgery for cataracts in people with age‐related macular degeneration 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsModerate
Immediate cataract surgery vs delayed cataract surgery
Vision‐related quality of life · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review
- Surgery for cataracts in people with age‐related macular degeneration 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsLow
Summary of findings: autologous serum vs artificial tears
Participant‐reported symptoms Range of scale: 0‐100, where a higher score is worse · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsLow
Summary of findings: autologous serum vs Normal saline
Fluorescein staining Range of scale: 0‐9, where a higher score is worse · people with dry eye
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: autologous serum vs Normal saline
Rose Bengal staining Range of scale: 0‐9, where a higher score is worse · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: autologous serum vs artificial tears
Fluorescein staining Range of scale: 0‐9, where a higher score is worse · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsLow
Summary of findings: autologous serum vs artificial tears
Rose Bengal staining Range of scale: 0‐9, where a higher score is worse · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsLow
Ocriplasmin injection vs control
Mean change in validated visual function questionnaire score from baseline Score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores are better visual function · people with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedModerate
Intervention not reported
Best corrected visual acuity at 2 to 3 months (measured using logMAR scale. A score of 0 = good vision, higher score is worse vision) · people with fungal ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 434 participantsLow
Intervention not reported
Steepness of the cornea (maximal keratometry) (measured using dioptres. A higher dioptre represents steeper cornea and worse outcome) · people with keratoconus
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Intervention not reported
Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) (measured using logMAR scale. A score of 0 = good vision, higher score is worse vision) · people with keratoconus
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 94 participantsVery low
Laser photocoagulation vs control
Visual acuity · people with diabetic retinopathy
1 finding from 1 review
- Laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsLow