Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,112 questions in 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 27.8%Ungraded 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Antiviral (B) versus debridement (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Debridement + antiviral or interferon (B) versus debridement (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Debridement + antiviral (B) versus antiviral (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Vidarabine (B) versus inactive control (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Vidarabine (B) versus idoxuridine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Trifluridine (B) versus idoxuridine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Acyclovir (B) versus idoxuridine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Brivudine (B) versus idoxuridine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Trifluridine (B) versus vidarabine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Acyclovir (B) versus vidarabine (A) · trial participants with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis Outcomes: corneal epithelial healing at 7 and 14…
Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Clnical cure at 2 to 3 months · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.07 [0.89, 1.28]1 study · 30 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Best corrected visual acuity at 2 to 3 months (measured using logMAR scale. A score of 0 = good vision, higher score is worse vision) · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 434 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Time to clinical cure · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
hazard ratio 1.25 [0.88, 1.15]2011 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Compliance with treatment · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Corneal perforation or penetrating keratoplasty, or both, at 2 to 3 months · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.4, 0.94]3 studies · 434 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Quality of life · people with fungal ulcers
Medical interventions for fungal keratitis (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
MMC vs 5‐FU
Failure of functioning trabeculectomy at 1 year · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.19, 2.2]11 studies · 634 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Intraocular pressure at 1 year · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 386 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity at 1 year · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.53, 7.59]5 studies · 328 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Postoperative complications: late hypotony · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.37 [0.41, 4.63]4 studies · 211 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Postoperative complications: choroidal detachment · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.45, 1.63]8 studies · 494 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Postoperative complications: endophthalmitis · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
RR 3.89 [0.44, 34.57]4 studies · 315 participantsLow
MMC vs 5‐FU
Quality of life at 1 year · wound healing in glaucoma surgery
Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Outcomes at two years
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Development of CNV
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.79, 1.46]11 studies · 2159 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Development of geographic atrophy
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.3 [0.38, 4.51]2 studies · 148 participantsLow
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Visual loss of 2‐3+ lines of visual acuity
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.99 [0.81, 1.22]9 studies · 2002 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Loss of ≥ 0.3 log units of contrast sensitivity
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.82 [0.2, 3.31]1 study · 82 participantsLow
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Reading speed in words/minute
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsLow
Summary of findings table: photocoagulation of drusen vs control
Drusen reduction
Laser treatment of drusen to prevent progression to advanced age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
OR 9.16 [6.28, 13.4]3 studies · 570 participantsHigh
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Mean change in IOP Measured by Goldmann applanation · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 489 participantsLow
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Mean change in medications Measured by number of bottles · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 301 participantsLow
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Proportion using one or more medications at one year after surgery Number of participants · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.47 [0.28, 0.8]5 studies · 453 participantsLow
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Proportion who received re‐operation to control IOP within one year Number of participants · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.15, 8.25]4 studies · 382 participantsLow
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
Proportion who received intervention for surgical complications within one year Number of participants · patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.34, 3.35]4 studies · 382 participantsLow
Vitrectomy vs observation
Mean visual acuity (logMAR) at 6‐12 months · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Vitrectomy vs observation
Hole closure at 6‐12 months · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
OR 31.4 [14.9, 66.3]3 studies · 265 participantsHigh
Vitrectomy vs observation
Reading acuity at 6 months · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 154 participantsLow
Vitrectomy vs observation
Reading speed (word/minute) at 6 months · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 118 participantsLow
Vitrectomy vs observation
Hole recurrence · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitrectomy vs observation
Adverse outcomes · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1997 participantsUngraded
Vitrectomy vs observation
Costs · participants with idiopathic macular hole
Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Loss of 3 or more lines of VA at 24 months · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.141 study · 236 participantsModerate
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Loss of 3 or more lines of VA at 36 months · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.251 study · 230 participantsModerate
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Incidence of CNV at 24 months · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.061 study · 224 participantsModerate
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Incidence of CNV at 36 months · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.121 study · 195 participantsModerate
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Progression of AMD over 5 years · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
HR 0.96 [0.84, 1.1]2 studies · 2343 participantsHigh
Omega 3 fatty acids vs placebo
Adverse effects · people with AMD
Omega 3 fatty acids for preventing or slowing the progression of age‐related macular degeneration (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.012 studies · 2343 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Progression (increase in maximal keratometry of 1.5 dioptres or more) · people with keratoconus
Corneal collagen cross‐linking for treating keratoconus (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.12 [0.01, 2]1 study · 19 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Steepness of the cornea (maximal keratometry) (measured using dioptres. A higher dioptre represents steeper cornea and worse outcome) · people with keratoconus
Corneal collagen cross‐linking for treating keratoconus (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 94 participantsVery low