Cochrane · systematic review · CD008671

Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Zhang, ML, Hirunyachote, P, Jampel, H · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

Eyes and VisionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Combined surgery versus phacoemulsification alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma

Population: patients with eyes with cataract and glaucoma
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mean change in IOP Measured by Goldmann applanation
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
no estimate extracted6 studies · 489 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Mean change in medications Measured by number of bottles
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
no estimate extracted2 studies · 301 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Proportion using one or more medications at one year after surgery Number of participants
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
RR 0.47 [0.28, 0.8]5 studies · 453 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Proportion who received re‐operation to control IOP within one year Number of participants
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
RR 1.13 [0.15, 8.25]4 studies · 382 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Proportion who received intervention for surgical complications within one year Number of participants
Combined surgery vs phacoemulsification alone
RR 1.06 [0.34, 3.35]4 studies · 382 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency