Cochrane · systematic review · CD006259

Mitomycin C versus 5‐Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery

Cabourne, E, Clarke, JCK, Schlottmann, PG, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

Eyes and VisionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 85.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

MMC compared to 5‐FU for wound healing in glaucoma surgery

Population: wound healing in glaucoma surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Failure of functioning trabeculectomy at 1 year
MMC vs 5‐FU
RR 0.65 [0.19, 2.2]11 studies · 634 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Intraocular pressure at 1 year
MMC vs 5‐FU
no estimate extracted7 studies · 386 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity at 1 year
MMC vs 5‐FU
RR 2 [0.53, 7.59]5 studies · 328 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Postoperative complications: late hypotony
MMC vs 5‐FU
RR 1.37 [0.41, 4.63]4 studies · 211 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Postoperative complications: choroidal detachment
MMC vs 5‐FU
RR 0.86 [0.45, 1.63]8 studies · 494 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Postoperative complications: endophthalmitis
MMC vs 5‐FU
RR 3.89 [0.44, 34.57]4 studies · 315 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life at 1 year
MMC vs 5‐FU
no estimate extractedNRNo studies