Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

866 questions in 43 reviews · Oral and maxillofacial surgery

current versions
No studies 188 · 21.7%Ungraded 548 · 63.3%Very low 81 · 9.4%Low 37 · 4.3%Moderate 8 · 0.9%High 4 · 0.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Reference (lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability)
Postmenopausal osteoporosis with pathological fracture · Postmenopausal women (European ancestry) · Lifelong genetic liability, MVMR (IVW), adjusted for DMFS
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.016 [0.867, 1.191]281786 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS
Forearm fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR Weighted Median
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.914 [0.799, 1.046]490889 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted dental caries (DMFS index) vs Reference (1-SD lower genetically predicted DMFS)
Fracture of femur · European-ancestry adults · Lifelong genetic liability, SVMR (IVW), total causal effect
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.126 [0.975, 1.300]489106 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability
Osteoporosis · European GWAS participants · SVMR Weighted Median
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.002 [0.925, 1.086]483725 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) · Females (all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Females, low-to-moderate risk-of-bias studies: 0.20 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
MD 0.02 [-0.02, 0.07]NRUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Reference (lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability)
Osteoporosis · European-ancestry adults · Lifelong genetic liability, SVMR (IVW), total causal effect
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.998 [0.933, 1.067]483725 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS, adjusted for periodontitis
Osteoporosis with pathological fracture · European GWAS participants · MVMR MR-Egger
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.011 [0.876, 1.167]376746 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted dental caries (DMFS index) vs Reference (1-SD lower genetically predicted DMFS)
Osteoporosis · European-ancestry adults · Lifelong genetic liability, SVMR (IVW), total causal effect
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.156 [0.994, 1.343]483725 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Risk of fractures (any site) · General population (both sexes, all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Drinking-water fluoride 2.0 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
RR 1.06 [0.80, 1.41]4 studiesUngraded
Orofacial cleft (cleft lip and/or palate) as exposure vs Healthy controls without cleft
Plaque Index (PI) · Individuals assessed for periodontal health (mainly children and adolescents, age >2 years)
Oral health in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of… (2025)
MD 0.29 [0.24, 0.34]6 studies · 1618 participantsLow
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS
Osteoporosis · European GWAS participants · SVMR MR-Egger
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.329 [0.991, 1.782]483725 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability
Postmenopausal osteoporosis with pathological fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR MR-Egger
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.934 [0.786, 1.111]281786 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Reference (lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability)
Fracture of forearm · European-ancestry adults · Lifelong genetic liability, SVMR (IVW), total causal effect
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.990 [0.951, 1.031]490889 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted dental caries (DMFS index) vs Reference (1-SD lower genetically predicted DMFS)
Postmenopausal osteoporosis with pathological fracture · Postmenopausal women (European ancestry) · Lifelong genetic liability, SVMR (IVW), total causal effect
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.343 [0.948, 1.901]281786 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Risk of femoral fractures · General population (both sexes, all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Drinking-water fluoride 0.5 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
RR 0.86 [0.71, 1.05]NRUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability
Osteoporosis · European GWAS participants · SVMR IVW
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.998 [0.933, 1.067]483725 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS
Osteoporosis with pathological fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR Maximum Likelihood
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.278 [0.921, 1.773]376746 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Risk of wrist fractures · General population (both sexes, all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Drinking-water fluoride 0.01 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
RR 1.00 [0.99, 1.01]NRUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Risk of fragility fractures · Females (all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Females: drinking-water fluoride 0.9 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
RR 1.00 [0.79, 1.27]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Osteoporosis · DMFS, bias-corrected (MR-RAPS/Debiased IVW)
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.171 [1.051, 1.304]NRUngraded
Genetically predicted periodontitis vs Lower genetically predicted periodontitis liability
Lumbar spine and pelvis fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR Maximum Likelihood
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 1.055 [0.983, 1.132]490700 participantsUngraded
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS
Forearm fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR MR-Egger
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.883 [0.738, 1.057]490889 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride exposure vs Null / lowest drinking-water fluoride exposure (reference)
Hip/femoral bone mineral density (BMD) · Females (all ages) · Long-term / lifetime fluoride exposure, Females, low-to-moderate risk-of-bias studies: 4.0 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
MD 0.09 [-0.09, 0.27]NRUngraded
Genetically predicted DMFS (dental caries) vs Lower genetically predicted DMFS
Forearm fracture · European GWAS participants · SVMR Maximum Likelihood
From teeth to bone: dental caries has causal effects on osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. (2025)
OR 0.920 [0.836, 1.011]490889 participantsUngraded
Higher drinking-water fluoride concentration vs Null/reference drinking-water fluoride exposure
Spine bone mineral density · Females · Females, low-to-moderate risk-of-bias studies: 0.7 to 2.35 mg/L vs null
The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis. (2025)
MD 0.06 [-0.01, 0.12]NRUngraded
Age 8-10 years vs Age >10 years
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents with maxillary permanent first molar extraction · Follow-up to complete eruption of the permanent second molar, Maxilla
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR >100.00 [0.01, >100.00]3 studiesUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Severity of joint noise · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 2 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Self-reported joint pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 4 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Acupuncture
Range of mandibular motion · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term, Myofascial pain TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
MD 5.54 [-8.06, 19.13]2 studies · 67 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs No treatment or placebo (non-occlusal or transparent-foil placebo splint)
Joint pain at rest · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (10 weeks), Mixed TMD
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.13 [0.02, 0.94]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) status and its oral microbiota (exposure/grouping) vs Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years without CLP (controls)
Dental caries (proportion of patients with caries) · Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP)
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
OR 2.03 [1.46, 2.84]3 studies · 688 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Periodontopathogenic microbiota composition · Narrative: Campylobacter/Fusobacterium/F. nucleatum/Prevotella intermedia-nigrescens/Parvimonas micra/Porphyromonas gingivalis in CLP
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
no estimate extracted6 studiesUngraded
Non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) status and its oral microbiota (exposure/grouping) vs Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years without CLP (controls)
Lactobacillus spp. salivary/plaque counts (cariogenic microbiota) · Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP)
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
For the outcome of the presence of Lactobacillus spp., there were no significant differences between patients with CLP and healthy patients, and the diversity of the studies led to high heterogeneity; however, the p…NRUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Muscle pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 4 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Behavioural therapy (counselling, CBT, relaxation, self-care management)
Muscle pain at rest · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 4 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) status and its oral microbiota (exposure/grouping) vs Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years without CLP (controls)
Streptococcus mutans salivary/plaque counts (cariogenic microbiota) · Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP)
Characterization of the oral microbiota and the relationship of the oral microbiota with the dental and… (2024)
Two studies were analyzed that reported the outcome in means of the presence of Streptococcus mutans, and that there was no difference between the means for healthy patients and those with CLP. The results of these…2 studiesUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Recurrence rate · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 2 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Physical therapy (ultrasound, exercise, sensorimotor training, laser, TENS, manual therapy)
Self-reported joint pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 3 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Mandibular third molar present vs Mandibular third molar absent
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 2.28 [1.67, 3.09]4 studies · 467 participantsLow
Extraction of the permanent first molar vs None (single-group prevalence)
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent… · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Maxilla
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
Prevalence 85.3 [73.7, 92.3]9 studies · 665 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Acupuncture
Recurrence rate · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 5 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological therapy
Recurrence rate · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 6 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological therapy
Discomfort · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 6 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological therapy
Severity of joint noise · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 6 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Extraction of a maxillary permanent first molar vs Extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents (<18 years) after extraction of a permanent first molar before eruption of the permanent… · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Overall
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 7.77 [4.99, 12.11]9 studies · 1349 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Spontaneous space closure · Mandible: M2 Demirjian E-F vs G-H
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 42.01 studyUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Pharmacological therapy
Self-reported joint pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) · Short term (3 months), Osteoarthritis
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.10 [0.83, 5.30]1 study · 29 participantsVery low
Occlusal splint vs Another occlusal splint with a different mechanism of action
Muscle pain when chewing · People with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)
Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders (2024) · Cochrane
Listed in Summary of findings 2 as 'Not reported'; this outcome was not reported by any included study for this comparison.0 studiesNo studies
Extraction at patient age 11-12 years vs Extraction at patient age 8-10 years
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 0.82 [0.35, 1.88]2 studiesUngraded
Extraction at patient age 11-12 years vs Extraction at patient age 8-10 years
Spontaneous space closure · Children and adolescents after extraction of a mandibular permanent first molar (before eruption of the second molar) · Until eruption of the permanent second molar (median follow-up 4.0 years), Mandible
Spontaneous space closure after extraction of permanent first molars in children and adolescents: a… (2024)
OR 0.29 [0.11, 0.81]2 studiesUngraded