Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

479 questions · 502 findings · 35 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 140 · 27.9%GRADE not reported 24 · 4.8%Very low 139 · 27.7%Low 137 · 27.3%Moderate 51 · 10.2%High 11 · 2.2%

Intervention not reported

Clinical outcomes (fasting blood glucose,random blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol, peak expiratory flow rate; · Pharmacies or pharmacists delivering services in outpatient settings and patients with various diseases*
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen within 24 hours of admission · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention probably leads to higher quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Whole‐facility changes: Home‐like models vs traditional environment

Global behaviour Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Nursing Home version (NPI‐NH) and Nurses Observations Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER) (lower scores = better) · older adults living in long‐term residential care including, but not limited to, dementia‐specific care settings
1 finding from 1 review

Whole‐facility changes: Home‐like models vs traditional environment

Depression Revised Memory and Behaviour Problems Checklist (RMBPC) and Mood Scale Score (MSS) (lower scores = better) · older adults living in long‐term residential care including, but not limited to, dementia‐specific care settings
1 finding from 1 review

Whole‐facility changes: Home‐like models vs traditional environment

Serious adverse effects Physical restraints, reported as percentage points (lower = better) · older adults living in long‐term residential care including, but not limited to, dementia‐specific care settings

It is very uncertain whether whole‐facility changes: Home‐like models changes serious adverse effects Physical restraints, reported as percentage… compared with traditional environment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Health‐promotion interventions within community pharmacy vs usual treatment alone

Pharmacy user intermediate clinical outcomes e.g. cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin5 (Lower scores indicate a better outcome) · community pharmacy workers (examples pharmacists, counter assistants etc), community pharmacy users
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Caesarean section ‐ low risk group · nurses, midwives, physicians

The intervention showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ low risk group (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of participants waiting below a recommended time threshold · patients needing elective specialist ambulatory visit or surgery
1 finding from 1 review