Question · asked by 1 review
ACT subsidies combined with supportive interventions vs no subsidies: ACT use (percentage of children under 5 years receiving ACT on the same day or following day of fever onset)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
ACT subsidies combined with supportive interventions vs no subsidies ACT use (percentage of children under 5 years receiving ACT on the same day or following day of fever onset) · Patients seeking treatment for suspected uncomplicated malaria Subsidising artemisinin‐based combination therapy in the private retail sector (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 26626 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subsidising artemisinin‐based combination therapy in the private retail sector 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.