Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,935 questions · 1,986 findings · 260 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 503 · 25.3%GRADE not reported 76 · 3.8%Very low 593 · 29.9%Low 509 · 25.6%Moderate 241 · 12.1%High 64 · 3.2%

Comparison 9.6: Telephone contact, emergency cards, and letters vs TAU or another comparator

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults

Comparison 9.6: Telephone contact, emergency cards, and letters showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age (phone call/SMS only) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives may leads to higher proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG (phone call/SMS only) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG (SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3 (phone call/SMS only) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3… compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3 (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ measles/MMR (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives may leads to higher proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

One uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial embolisation) vs another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical devascularisation plus B‐Lynch)

Side effects of the intervention (e.g. trauma, necrosis) · treating primary postpartum haemorrhage

It is very uncertain whether one uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial… changes side effects of the intervention (e.g. trauma, necrosis) compared with another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Bupropion therapy plus behavioral intervention vs behavioral intervention alone (continuous waterpipe smoking abstinence, defined as an expired CO of 9 ppm or less at the 6‐month postintervention · people who use waterpipe

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes bupropion therapy plus behavioral intervention vs behavioral… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: figure‐of‐eight bandage vs arm sling

Treatment failure (Number of participants who have undergone or are being considered for a surgical intervention) · patients (mainly young male adults) with fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Physical well‐being SF‐36 Physical Component Summary Score 0 to 100, higher scores indicate higher levels of physical well‐being Immediately post‐intervention · Cancer patients with cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review