Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs usual care: Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs routine care Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age (phone call/SMS) · children under 5 years of age Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty). Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.12 [1, 1.25] | 6 studies · 3869 participants | Low |
Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives vs routine care Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age (SMS + monetary incentive) · children under 5 years of age Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives showed no clear difference in proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age… compared with routine care (low certainty). Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.01 [0.98, 1.03] | 1 study · 766 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.