Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,463 questions in 125 reviews · Anaesthesia

current versions
No studies 197 · 13.5%Ungraded 203 · 13.9%Very low 307 · 21%Low 441 · 30.1%Moderate 245 · 16.7%High 70 · 4.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Conversion to GA4 · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.09, 1.17]10 studies · 614 participantsVery low
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Supplemental analgesia5 · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.26, 1.41]9 studies · 554 participantsVery low
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Requirement for ephedrine6 · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.57, 1.38]4 studies · 256 participantsVery low
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Nausea and vomiting7 · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.57, 1.72]7 studies · 433 participantsLow
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Headache8 Participant‐reported · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.82 [0.47, 6.99]3 studies · 234 participantsLow
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Time to dermatomal block T4 block (mins) · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 128 participantsModerate
Hyperbaric bupivacaine vs Isobaric bupivacaine
Amount of ephedrine used(mg/person) · women with spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 386 participantsModerate
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Mortality · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 1087 participantsVery low
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Serious adverse events · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 1087 participantsVery low
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Fluid balance (L) · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 737 participantsLow
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Total volume of crystalloid administered (L) · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 871 participantsModerate
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Peak serum sodium · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted16 studies · 780 participantsModerate
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Final serum sodium · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 640 participantsModerate
Hypertonic salt vs isotonic salt solution
Maximum intraoperative cardiac index · any people undergoing surgery with fluid resuscitation
Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 418 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Apgar scores at 1 minute · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 519 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Apgar scores at 5 minutes · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 519 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Proportion of maternal participants with desaturation1 · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean maternal arterial oxygen tension (mm Hg) (PaO2) · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 241 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mean maternal oxygen saturation (%) · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 209 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mean oxygen tension (mm Hg) in umbilical artery (UaPO2) · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 504 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mean oxygen tension (mm Hg) in umbilical vein (UvPO2) · low‐risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 683 participantsVery low
Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics
Total blood loss ‐ children · patients undergoing FESS
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics
Total blood loss ‐ adults · patients undergoing FESS
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 88 participantsModerate
Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics
Quality of surgical field Scale from 0 to 5 · patients undergoing FESS
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 277 participantsLow
Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics
Operation time · patients undergoing FESS
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 214 participantsLow
Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics
Failure of deliberate hypotension (%) · patients undergoing FESS
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.24 [0.09, 0.66]1 study · 88 participantsModerate
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Time to loss of eyelash reflex · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 443 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Cough · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.23 [0.53, 2.81]8 studies · 589 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Laryngospasm · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.59 [0.16, 15.92]7 studies · 588 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Breath holding · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 1.16 [0.47, 2.83]5 studies · 389 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Apneoa · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.14 [1.72, 5.7]2 studies · 160 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Patient movement · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.69, 1.89]5 studies · 445 participantsLow
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration
Bradycardia · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.8 [0.22, 2.88]3 studies · 199 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood loss (mL: antifibrinolytics vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 207 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving transfusion with allogeneic blood: antifibrinolytics vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.73]2 studies · 79 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving transfusion with allogeneic blood: aminocaproic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving transfusion with allogeneic blood: aprotinin vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.73]1 study · 43 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mean total blood transfused (mL): antifibrinolytics vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 207 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood transfused (mL): aminocaproic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood transfused (mL): aprotinin vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 87 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood transfused (mL): tranexamic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 84 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood loss (mL): aminocaproic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood loss (mL): aprotinin vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 87 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood loss (mL): tranexamic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 84 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean total blood loss (mL): aminocaproic acid vs tranexamic acid · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving blood transfusion: antifibrinolytics vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.5, 0.85]4 studies · 195 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving blood transfusion: aminocaproic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.48 [0.3, 0.76]2 studies · 108 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving blood transfusion: aprotinin vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.44, 1.27]1 study · 43 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants receiving blood transfusion: tranexamic acid vs placebo · children undergoing surgery for scoliosis
Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.56, 1.3]1 study · 44 participantsVery low
Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard clinical and electronic monitoring
Awareness Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery
Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.98 [0.59, 1.62]9 studies · 34744 participantsLow