Cochrane · systematic review · CD006623
Deliberate hypotension with propofol under anaesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)
Boonmak, P, Boonmak, S, Laopaiboon, M · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 2 versionsPropofol versus inhalation anaesthetics for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)
Population: patients undergoing FESS
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Total blood loss ‐ children Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 70 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Total blood loss ‐ adults Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 88 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of surgical field Scale from 0 to 5 Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 277 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Operation time Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 214 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Failure of deliberate hypotension (%) Propofol vs inhalation anaesthetics | RR 0.24 [0.09, 0.66] | 1 study · 88 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |