INTERMITTENT (EARLY‐BASED) vs MAINTENANCE THERAPY
Cost‐effectiveness · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
1,888 questions · 2,009 findings · 352 reviews
No studies found 224 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 265 · 13.2%Very low 551 · 27.4%Low 540 · 26.9%Moderate 311 · 15.5%High 118 · 5.9%
INTERMITTENT (EARLY‐BASED) vs MAINTENANCE THERAPY
Relapse · patients with schizophrenia
INTERMITTENT (EARLY‐BASED) may leads to higher relapse: long term (+ 26 weeks) as defined in each study compared with MAINTENANCE THERAPY (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 2.33 [1.32, 4.12]2 studies · 155 participantsLow
INTERMITTENT (EARLY‐BASED) vs MAINTENANCE THERAPY
Hospital admissions · patients with schizophrenia
INTERMITTENT (EARLY‐BASED) probably leads to higher hospitalisation: long term (+ 26 weeks) as defined in each study compared with MAINTENANCE THERAPY (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.16 [1.33, 2.08]5 studies · 625 participantsModerate
Early postoperative feeding vs usual care
Complications
It is very uncertain whether early postoperative feeding changes complications compared with standard management (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.14 [0.85, 1.53]1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Early postoperative feeding vs usual care
Length of hospital stay
1 finding from 1 review
- Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 102 participantsLow
Early postoperative feeding vs usual care
All‐cause mortality
Early postoperative feeding showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard management (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.52 [0.1, 2.71]1 study · 102 participantsLow
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for abduction ‐ medium term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted3 studies · 378 participantsVery low
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for forward flexion ‐ short term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 262 participantsLow
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for forward flexion ‐ medium term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted3 studies · 321 participantsVery low
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for external rotation ‐ medium term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted3 studies · 378 participantsVery low
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for internal rotation ‐ medium term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted3 studies · 378 participantsLow
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Lymphoedema ‐ medium term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
It is very uncertain whether early shoulder mobilising exercises changes lymphoedema ‐ medium term compared with delayed shoulder mobilising exercises (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.69 [0.94, 3.01]3 studies · 378 participantsVery low
Early shoulder mobilising exercises vs delayed shoulder mobilising exercises
Shoulder range of motion for abduction ‐ short term · patients at risk for secondary upper limb lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 262 participantsVery low
Early loading of mini-screw implant vs Delayed loading of mini-screw implant
Success of the anchorage device · Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment requiring surgical (mini-screw implant) anchorage
Early loading of mini-screw implant showed no clear difference in success of the anchorage device compared with delayed loading of mini-screw implant; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
- Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods 2014 · Cochrane All outcomesRR 1.00 [0.83, 1.20]2 studies · 36 participantsGRADE not reported
Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment
Perioperative death and strokes · people with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
It is very uncertain whether very early cerebral revascularization changes stroke and Death < 30 days compared with delayed treatment (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 3.3 [0.4, 29.2]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
- Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.5 [0.1, 1.6]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment
Length of hospital stay · people with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment
Myocardial infarction (0 to 30 days) · people with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear vs Late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear
PAR score · Children (7 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 16 years) with prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion)
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear showed no clear difference in PAR score compared with late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
- Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesEnd of orthodontic treatment (phase II)MD -1.55 [-3.7, 0.6]2 studies · 177 participantsGRADE not reported
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear vs Late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear
Incidence of new incisal trauma · Children (7 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 16 years) with prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion)
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear may leads to lower incidence of new incisal trauma compared with late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesEnd of orthodontic treatment (phase II)OR 0.45 [0.25, 0.8]2 studies · 237 participantsLow
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear vs Late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear
Final overjet · Children (7 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 16 years) with prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion)
Early treatment (two-phase) with headgear showed no clear difference in final overjet compared with late treatment (one-phase in adolescence) with headgear (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesEnd of orthodontic treatment (phase II)MD -0.22 [-0.56, 0.12]2 studies · 238 participantsLow
- Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesEnd of phase I (growth modification phase)MD -1.07 [-1.63, -0.51]2 studies · 278 participantsGRADE not reported